Ecological Systems for Students Who Use AAC: Stakeholders' Views on Factors Impacting Intervention and Outcomes

被引:22
作者
Biggs, Elizabeth E. [1 ]
Hacker, Rebecca E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Special Educ, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
augmentative and alternative communication (AAC); ecological systems; implementation science; qualitative methods; research to practice; COMPLEX COMMUNICATION NEEDS; INDIVIDUALS; SERVICES; GAP;
D O I
10.1177/15407969211052309
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Although substantial evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention for students with severe disabilities who have complex communication needs, increasing importance is being placed on understanding how to move research into practice. This descriptive qualitative study focused on understanding the views of 19 parents and professionals (i.e., special education teachers, paraeducators, and speech-language pathologists) related to factors impacting intervention and outcomes for students with complex communication needs. Within an implementation science perspective, analysis involved applying ecological systems theory to understand factors across systems acting as challenges or facilitators to effective AAC intervention and to outcomes more broadly for students with complex communication needs. Findings produce insight into the ways student-related and micro-, meso-, macro-, and exosystem factors impact intervention implementation and outcomes, highlighting the importance of cross-cutting factors associated with AAC access, family-school partnerships and supports, and inclusive education. Implications for research and practice are discussed related to how these findings can be used to bridge the gap between research and practice for students with complex communication needs.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 277
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice [J].
Morin, Kristi L. ;
Ganz, Jennifer B. ;
Gregori, Emily V. ;
Foster, Margaret J. ;
Gerow, Stephanie L. ;
Genc-Tosun, Derya ;
Hong, Ee Rea .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 34 (02) :104-117
[22]  
Odom S.L., 2004, Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, V4, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1471-3802.2004.00016.X, 10.1111/J.1471-3802.2004.00016.x]
[23]   Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice: Implementation Science [J].
Olswang, Lesley B. ;
Prelock, Patricia A. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (06) :S1818-S1826
[24]  
Patton M. Q., 1990, Qualitative evaluation and research methods
[25]  
Rodriguez A.M., 2020, Inclusion, V8, P6, DOI DOI 10.1352/2326-6988-8.1.6
[26]  
Saldana J., 2016, The coding manual for qualitative researchers, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[27]  
Sandelowski M, 2000, RES NURS HEALTH, V23, P334, DOI 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO
[28]  
2-G
[29]  
Schliep ME., 2017, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, V11, P82, DOI [10.1080/17489539.2017.1394807, DOI 10.1080/17489539.2017.1394807]
[30]   A boy and his AAC team: building instructional competence across team members [J].
Snodgrass, Melinda R. ;
Meadan, Hedda .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2018, 34 (03) :167-179