Evaluation of liquefaction potential using ground response analysis incorporating mohr-coulomb model

被引:5
|
作者
Firoj, Mohd [1 ]
Bahuguna, Ashish [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Roorkee, Dept Earthquake Engn, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
SPT; Ground response analysis; Liquefaction potential; MATLAB; Simplified method; SUSCEPTIBILITY; FAILURE; SOILS;
D O I
10.1007/s41062-022-00810-2
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, a MATLAB code is developed to carry out the liquefaction analysis using a simplified and ground response analysis (GRA) approach. For the GRA approach, linear, equivalent linear and Mohr-Coulomb (MC) soil models are incorporated in the code. For the equivalent linear soil model, modulus reduction and damping curve are used, while in the MC model, the plasticity of soil is utilised using the c-phi strength parameters. In order to validate the MATLAB code for the GRA approach, DEEPSOIL (set as a benchmark) results are compared in terms of amplification factor, strain transfer function, acceleration time history, strain time history and response spectrum. It is found that MATLAB code yields the exact results as those by DEEPSOIL. The amplification factor for the MC model is higher as compared to the linear model of soil, and the MC model shifts the predominant frequency of each borehole on the lower side. The Guwahati region is taken as a case study to show the application of the developed MATLAB code. The investigation is carried out at the five locations of the borehole. The cyclic stress is examined using the simplified and ground response analysis caused by the earthquake motion, which is further used in the calculation of the factor of safety. The factor of safety against the liquefaction is calculated at a regular interval of depth at five boreholes using the simplified and GRA approach. It is observed that the average FOS using the simplified approach is higher as compared to GRA (equivalent linear and MC soil model) approach. At all the boreholes, the FOS is less than unity, which shows a higher probability of liquefaction potential.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ground response analysis and liquefaction for Kalyani region, Kolkata
    Sajjan Kumar
    Pradeep Muley
    Syed Nurussyidyn Madani
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 99127 - 99146
  • [22] Ground response analysis and liquefaction for Kalyani region, Kolkata
    Kumar, Sajjan
    Muley, Pradeep
    Madani, Syed Nurussyidyn
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (44) : 99127 - 99146
  • [23] A quantitative analysis procedure for solving safety factor of tunnel preliminary support considering the equivalence between Hoek-Brown and Mohr-Coulomb criteria
    Liu, Yangyang
    Fang, Yanbing
    Su, Ya
    Zhang, Peng
    Su, Yonghua
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2023, 63 (04)
  • [24] Nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion: Integration in ADMM-based finite element limit analysis formulation and application to slope stability assessment
    da Silva, M. Vicente
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2025, 177
  • [25] Ground response analysis and liquefaction hazard assessment for Vishakhapatnam city
    Putti S.P.
    Satyam N.
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2018, 3 (1)
  • [26] Liquefaction and Ground Response Analysis of Indian Pond Ash Using Shear Wave Velocity Measurements
    Mohanty, Supriya
    Patra, Nihar Ranjan
    GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V: SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS, EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS, AND REGIONAL-SCALE ASSESSMENT, 2018, (291): : 504 - 513
  • [27] Liquefaction potential analysis using hybrid multi-objective intelligence model
    Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri
    Fardad Maghsoudi Moud
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79
  • [28] Upper bound analysis of ultimate pullout capacity of shallow 3-D circular plate anchors based on nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion
    Zhao Lian-heng
    Tan Yi-gao
    Hu Shi-hong
    Deng Dong-ping
    Yang Xin-ping
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY, 2018, 25 (09) : 2272 - 2288
  • [29] Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests
    Juang, CH
    Chen, CJ
    Jiang, T
    Andrus, RD
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (06) : 1195 - 1208
  • [30] Site-scale liquefaction potential analysis using a sectional random field model
    Gholampour, Amir
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2022, 297