Finding the right indicators for assessing quality midwifery care

被引:23
作者
de Bruin-Kooistra, Mieneke [1 ]
Amelink-Verburg, Marianne P. [2 ]
Buitendijk, Simone E. [3 ]
Westert, Gert P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Hlth Care Inspectorate IGZ, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
quality indicators (measurement of quality); outcome and process assessment (health care); maternity care; Delphi method; MATERNITY CARE; HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL INDICATORS; OF-CARE; PREGNANCY; LABOR;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzs006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
To identify a set of indicators for monitoring the quality of maternity care for low-risk women provided by primary care midwives and general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. A Project Group (midwives, GPs, policymakers and researchers) defined a long list of potential indicators based on the literature, national guidelines and expert opinion. This list was assessed against the AIRE (Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation) instrument criteria, resulting in a short list of draft indicators. In a two-round Delphi survey, a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders reviewed the elaborated draft indicators, rating both the relationship between indicator and quality of care and the feasibility. A multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of 28 midwives, 2 GPs, 3 obstetricians and 3 maternity assistants, randomly selected from different regions in the Netherlands. None. Set of quality indicators for midwifery care. The Project Group generated a list of 115 potential indicators which was reduced to 35 using the AIRE criteria. The 35 draft indicators were discussed by a Delphi panel. In total, 26 indicators were recommended by the participants as relevant indicators of midwifery care, representing several levels of measurement. Eight structure indicators, 12 process indicators and 6 outcome indicators were addressing the various phases of midwifery care. We identified a set of quality indicators concerning midwifery care provision in a low-risk population. Practicing maternity care providers adopted the large majority (83) of the draft indicators proposed as a feasible set of indicators, describing the structure, process and outcome. The input from multidisciplinary experts in the process of identifying the right indicators showed to be essential in all phases of development.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care
    Symon, Andrew
    Pringle, Jan
    Cheyne, Helen
    Downe, Soo
    Hundley, Vanora
    Lee, Elaine
    Lynn, Fiona
    McFadden, Alison
    McNeill, Jenny
    Renfrew, Mary J.
    Ross-Davie, Mary
    van Teijlingen, Edwin
    Whitford, Heather
    Alderdice, Fiona
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [22] The views and experiences of LGBTQ plus people regarding midwifery care: A systematic review of the international evidence
    McCann, Edward
    Brown, Michael
    Hollins-Martin, Caroline
    Murray, Karen
    McCormick, Freda
    MIDWIFERY, 2021, 103
  • [23] Quality of intrapartum care assessed by women participating in a midwifery model of continuity of care
    Hildingsson, Ingegerd
    Karlstrom, Annika
    Rubertsson, Christine
    Larsson, Birgitta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2021, 5 : 1 - 10
  • [24] Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus
    Sibanda, Thabani
    Fox, Robert
    Draycott, Timothy J.
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Richmond, David
    Simms, Rebecca A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [25] Development of quality of care indicators to support chronic disease management
    Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
    Pomey, Marie-Pascale
    Del Grande, Claudio
    Cote, Brigitte
    Tremblay, Eric
    Ghorbel, Monia
    Phuong Hua
    SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2015, 27 : S67 - S75
  • [26] Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review
    Arslan, Ilgin G.
    Rozendaal, Rianne M.
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Stitzinger, Saskia A. G.
    Van de Kerkhove, Maarten-Paul
    Voorbrood, Vincent M., I
    Bindels, Patrick J. E.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A.
    Schiphof, Dieuwke
    RMD OPEN, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [27] Quality Indicators for Youth Transitioning to Adult Care: A Systematic Review
    Bailey, Katherine
    Lee, Stephanie
    de Los Reyes, Thomas
    Lo, Lisha
    Cleverley, Kristin
    Pidduck, Jacklynn
    Mahood, Quenby
    Gorter, Jan Willem
    Toulany, Alene
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 150 (01)
  • [28] Models for midwifery care: A mapping review
    Eri, Tine S.
    Berg, Marie
    Dahl, Bente
    Gottfreosdottir, Helga
    Sommerseth, Eva
    Prinds, Christina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2020, 4
  • [29] Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol
    Lathlean, Timothy J. H.
    Inacio, Maria C.
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Gray, Len
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Hibbert, Peter
    Comans, Tracy
    Crotty, Maria
    Wesselingh, Steve
    Sluggett, Janet K.
    Ward, Stephanie
    Wabe, Nasir
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (09) : 1857 - 1865
  • [30] ‘At the right time, in the right way, with the right resources’: perceptions of the quality of care provided during childbirth in Malawi
    Elizabeth O’Donnell
    Bettina Utz
    Diana Khonje
    Nynke van den Broek
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14