Satisfaction analysis in men presenting with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: Psychological and social aspects

被引:10
作者
Gugliotta, A. [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, U. [2 ]
Reis, L. O. [2 ]
Mathews, W. E. [2 ]
Denardi, F. [2 ]
Stopiglia, Mamprim R.
Piccolotto Naccarato, A. M. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catolica Pontificia Campinas PUC Campinas, Div Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estatal Campinas Unicamp, Div Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2008年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; radiotherapy; psychological and social aspects; quality of life;
D O I
10.1016/S0210-4806(08)73855-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Analyze the treatment satisfaction and impact on patients with localized prostate cancer. Methods: One-hundred and eighty patients, with mean age of 60 years, were divided into three groups: group I - 100 patients submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), group II - 40 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT), and group III - 40 healthy men. A questionnaire was applied to the groups to assess physical and psychological changes 18 months after treatment. The investigational tool was based on two questionnaires; first: SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey), second: FACT-P (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy). Results: In group I, 70% never used pads, 5% presented with complete urinary incontinence, and 10% reported occasional stool leakage. In group II, 85% did not use pads and 5% reported two pads a day; 15% reported stool leakage or intestinal cramps. Sexual dysfunction was similar in both groups: 75% of the surgical group and 72.5% of the radiotherapy group reported erectile dysfunction. In the control group, 40% reported erectile dysfunction; 10% reported occasional stool leakage and none had changes regarding the overall treatment-related satisfaction. Seventy-eight percent of the RRP group and 77.5% of the RT group reported being happy respecting satisfaction with the accepted or chosen treatment, and affirmed that would choose it again. Conclusions: The assessment of treatment-related satisfaction determines the treatment tolerability. This study's results did not show any significant changes in this issue between both treatment modalities (p>0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 416
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison on efficacy of radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Chen, Linyan
    Li, Qingfang
    Wang, Yexiao
    Zhang, Yiwen
    Ma, Xuelei
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (45) : 79854 - 79863
  • [22] Importance of Baseline Potency Rate Assessment of Men Diagnosed with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Salomon, Georg
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Budaeus, Lars
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Briganti, Alberto
    Steuber, Thomas
    Heinzer, Hans
    Haese, Alexander
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Huland, Hartwig
    Chun, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (02) : 498 - 504
  • [23] Development of a Prehabilitation Multimodal Supportive Care Interventions for Men and Their Partners Before Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Paterson, Catherine
    Primeau, Charlotte
    Pullar, Irene
    Nabi, Ghulam
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2019, 42 (04) : E47 - E53
  • [24] Health related quality of life in Japanese men after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Namiki, S
    Tochigi, T
    Kuwahara, M
    Ioritani, N
    Terai, A
    Numata, I
    Satoh, M
    Saito, S
    Koinuma, N
    Arai, Y
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) : 619 - 627
  • [25] Racial differences in patient-reported outcomes among men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Koelker, Mara
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Frego, Nicola
    Ye, Jamie
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Hubbell, Harrison Taylor
    Edelen, Maria
    Steele, Grant
    Salinas, Kevin
    Meyer, Christian P.
    Makanjuola, Jonathan
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [26] A prospective quality-of-life study in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or interstitial brachytherapy
    Lee, WR
    Hall, MC
    McQuellon, RP
    Case, LD
    McCullough, DL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03): : 614 - 623
  • [27] Radiotherapy in the management of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Bartkowiak, Detlef
    Bottke, Dirk
    Wiegel, Thomas
    [J]. FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (05) : 669 - 679
  • [28] Clinical and biochemical outcomes of men undergoing radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Schreiber, David
    Rineer, Justin
    Weiss, Jeffrey P.
    Safdieh, Joseph
    Weiner, Joseph
    Rotman, Marvin
    Schwartz, David
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 33 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [29] Neutron beam radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy
    Raymond, JF
    Vuong, M
    Russell, KJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [30] Brachytherapy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy
    Gomez-Veiga, Francisco
    Marino, Alfonso
    Alvarez, Luis
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Fernandez, Carlos
    Pertega, Sonia
    Candal, Arturo
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 17 - 21