Comparison between three types of ammonia synthesis reactor configurations in terms of cooling methods

被引:48
作者
Khademi, Mohammad Hasan [1 ]
Sabbaghi, Reyhaneh Sadat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Isfahan, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, POB 81746-73441, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Ammonia synthesis; Internal direct cooling reactor; Adiabatic quench cooling reactor; Adiabatic indirect cooling reactor; Optimization; Differential evolution; THERMALLY COUPLED REACTOR; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; OPTIMAL-DESIGN; CYCLOHEXANE DEHYDROGENATION; METHANOL SYNTHESIS; SIMULATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2017.10.021
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this study, simulation and optimization of ammonia synthesis reactor based on the implemented cooling methods was presented in three cases: internal direct cooling reactor (IDCR), adiabatic quench cooling reactor (AQCR), and adiabatic indirect cooling reactor (AICR). A one-dimensional pseudo-homogeneous model was developed to investigate the effect of various parameters on maximum N-2 conversion at the outlet of IDCR, 2-bed AQCR and 2-bed AICR. Differential evolution algorithm was applied to optimize three types of ammonia synthesis reactor, considering N-2 conversion as the main objective. A comparison between IDCR, 2/3/4-bed AQCR and 2/3/4-bed AICR was carried out under the optimal operating conditions by considering the same catalyst volume, operating pressure and feed mass flow rate for all three types of reactor. The optimization results show that a maximum conversion of 0.26 was achieved in 3-bed AQCR, in which the temperature of feed gas to the first bed was 635 K, dimensionless lengths of each bed were 0.13, 0.25 and 0.62, and fractions of total feed flow rate quenching from the first to end bed were 0.2, 0.26 and 0.54, respectively. The optimum value of N-2 conversion was found 0.3 in IDCR at the gas temperature to the cooling tube of 495 K. In 3-bed AICR, the highest conversion of 0.3 was determined at temperature of inlet gas to each bed, 696 K, and dimensionless length of each bed, 0.33. Generally, IDCR, 3-bed AICR and 3-bed AQCR were suggested as ammonia synthesis reactor configurations from the most favorable to the least favorable. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Journal of Global Optimization, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1008202821328
[2]   Simulation and optimization of a horizontal ammonia synthesis reactor using genetic algorithm [J].
Azarhoosh, M. J. ;
Farivar, F. ;
Ebrahim, H. Ale .
RSC ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (26) :13419-13429
[3]   Differential evolution strategies for optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers [J].
Babu, B. V. ;
Munawar, S. A. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2007, 62 (14) :3720-3739
[4]   Modified differential evolution (MDE) for optimization of non-linear chemical processes [J].
Babu, B. V. ;
Angira, Rakesh .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 30 (6-7) :989-1002
[5]  
Babu B. V., 2004, P 8 WORLD MULT SYST
[6]   Optimal design of an auto-thermal ammonia synthesis reactor [J].
Babu, BV ;
Angira, R .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 29 (05) :1041-1045
[7]   STEADY-STATE SIMULATION OF AN AMMONIA SYNTHESIS CONVERTER [J].
BADDOUR, RF ;
BRAIN, PLT ;
LOGEAIS, BA ;
EYMERY, JP .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1965, 20 (04) :281-&
[8]  
Borges R. A., 2012, 3 INT C ENG OPT RIO
[9]   Modeling and optimization of an ammonia reactor using a penalty-like method [J].
Carvalho, Esdras P. ;
Borges, Carolina ;
Andrade, Doherty ;
Yuan, Jin Yun ;
Ravagnani, Mauro A. S. S. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2014, 237 :330-339
[10]  
Dashti A., 2006, Petrol. Coal, V48, P15