Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

被引:91
|
作者
Hanwella, Raveen [1 ]
Senanayake, Madhri [1 ]
de Silva, Varuni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Dept Psychol Med, Fac Med, Colombo, Sri Lanka
关键词
ONCE-A-DAY; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; ADHD;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-11-176
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychostimulants and non stimulants are effective in the treatment of ADHD. Efficacy of both methylphenidate and atomoxetine has been established in placebo controlled trials. Direct comparison of efficacy is now possible due to availability of results from several head-to-head trials of these two medications. Methods: All published, randomized, open label or double blind trials, comparing efficacy of methylphenidate with atomoxetine, in treatment of ADHD in children, diagnosed using DSM-IV (TM) criteria were included. The outcome studied was ADHDRS-IVParent:Inv score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Results: Nine randomized trials comparing methylphenidate and atomoxetine, with a total of 2762 participants were included. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in efficacy between methylphenidate and atomoxetine (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.26) (Z = 1.06, p = 0.29). Synthesis of data from eight trials found no significant difference in response rates (RR = 0.93 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.49). Sub group analysis showed a significant standardized mean difference favouring OROS methylphenidate (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.53 (Z = 3.05, p < 0.002). Immediate release methylphenidate was not superior to atomoxetine (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.19-0.12) (Z = 0.46, p = 0.64). Excluding open label trials did not significantly alter the effect size (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.04-0.21) (Z = 1.27, p = 0.20). All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of acceptability. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between atomoxetine and methylphenidate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.71). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p = 0.002, I-2 = 67%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity to be due to the open label trials (p = 0.001, I-2 = 81%). Conclusions: In general atomoxetine and methylphenidate have comparable efficacy and equal acceptability in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. However OROS methylphenidate is more effective than atomoxetine and may be considered as first line treatment in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combination of atomoxetine and methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - a narrative review
    Wolanczyk, Tomasz
    Brzozowska, Zuzanna
    PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 21 (04): : 274 - 280
  • [22] Effectiveness of atomoxetine and methylphenidate for problematic online gaming in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Park, Jeong Ha
    Lee, Young Sik
    Sohn, Ji Hyun
    Han, Doug Hyun
    HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2016, 31 (06) : 427 - 432
  • [23] A modelled economic evaluation comparing atomoxetine with methylphenidate in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Spain
    Hong, Jihyung
    Dilla, Tatiana
    Arellano, Jorge
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 9
  • [24] Atomoxetine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the adulthood: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Cunill, Ruth
    Castells, Xavier
    Tobias, Aurelio
    Capella, Dolors
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 (09) : 961 - 969
  • [25] Differential effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on intrinsic brain activity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Shang, C. Y.
    Yan, C. G.
    Lin, H. Y.
    Tseng, W. Y.
    Castellanos, F. X.
    Gau, S. S.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2016, 46 (15) : 3173 - 3185
  • [26] A network meta-analysis of atomoxetine and osmotic release oral system methylphenidate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adult patients
    Bushe, Chris
    Day, Kathleen
    Reed, Victoria
    Karlsdotter, Kristina
    Berggren, Lovisa
    Pitcher, Ashley
    Televantou, Foula
    Haynes, Virginia
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 30 (05) : 444 - 458
  • [27] The efficacy of atomoxetine in treating adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Ravishankar, Vinutha
    Chowdappa, Suresh Vedaveni
    Benegal, Vivek
    Muralidharan, Kesavan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 24 : 53 - 58
  • [28] Effects of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine Treatment on Improvement of Motor Coordination in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Kim, Ju Yeon
    Jung, Eunji
    Lee, Taeyeop
    Park, Kee Jeong
    Joung, Yoo-Sook
    Kim, Hyo-Won
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2025, 22 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [29] Atomoxetine:: a new treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents
    Purper-Ouakil, D
    Fourneret, P
    Wohl, M
    Rénéric, JP
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2005, 31 (03): : 337 - 348
  • [30] Neurofeedback vs. Methylphenidate for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in children and adolescents
    Abenia Abenia, Ma Isabel
    Jimenez-Muro Franco, Adriana
    CUADERNOS DE NEUROPSICOLOGIA-PANAMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 13 (02): : 171 - 181