Recruiting general practice patients for large clinical trials: lessons from the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study

被引:26
|
作者
Lockery, Jessica E. [1 ]
Collyer, Taya A. [1 ]
Abhayaratna, Walter P. [2 ,3 ]
Fitzgerald, Sharyn M. [1 ]
McNeil, John J. [1 ]
Nelson, Mark R. [4 ]
Orchard, Suzanne G. [1 ]
Reid, Christopher [5 ]
Stocks, Nigel P. [6 ]
Trevaks, Ruth E. [1 ]
Woods, Robyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Clin Med, Coll Hlth & Med, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Canberra Hosp, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[5] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESEARCH NETWORKS; PARTICIPANTS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.12060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the factors that contributed to the successful completion of recruitment for the largest clinical trial ever conducted in Australia, the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study. Design: Enrolment of GPs; identification of potential participants in general practice databases; screening of participants. Setting, participants: Selected general practices across southeast Australia (Tasmania, Victoria, Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, South Australia). Major outcomes: Numbers of patients per GP screened and randomised to participation; geographic and demographic factors that influenced screening and randomising of patients. Results: 2717 of 5833 GPs approached (47%) enrolled to recruit patients for the study; 2053 (76%) recruited at least one randomised participant. The highest randomised participant rate per GP was for Tasmania (median, 5; IQR, 1-11), driven by the high rate of participant inclusion at phone screening. GPs in inner regional (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.84) and outer regional areas (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.19-2.88) were more likely than GPs in major cities to recruit at least one randomised participant. GPs in areas with a high proportion of people aged 70 years or more were more likely to randomise at least one participant (per percentage point increase: aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). The number of randomised patients declined with time from GP enrolment to first randomisation. Conclusion: General practice can be a rich environment for research when barriers to recruitment are overcome. Including regional GPs and focusing efforts in areas with the highest proportions of potentially eligible participants improves recruitment. The success of ASPREE attests to the clinical importance of its research question for Australian GPs.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 173
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Health characteristics and aspirin use in participants at the baseline of the aspirin in reducing events in the elderly-eXTension (ASPREE-XT) observational study
    Ernst, Michael E.
    Broder, Jonathan C.
    Wolfe, Rory
    Woods, Robyn L.
    Nelson, Mark R.
    Ryan, Joanne
    Shah, Raj C.
    Orchard, Suzanne G.
    Chan, Andrew T.
    Espinoza, Sara E.
    Wilson, Michelle
    Kirpach, Brenda
    Reid, Christopher M.
    McNeil, John J.
    Williamson, Jeff D.
    Murray, Anne M.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 130
  • [2] Do patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus included in randomised clinical trials differ from general-practice patients? A cross-sectional comparative study
    Dugard, Amandine
    Giraudeau, Bruno
    Dibao-Dina, Clarisse
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [3] What does it cost to establish a practice-nurses-led clinical trial in general practice? Lessons learnt from the Patient Engagement And Coaching for Health (PEACH) study
    Blackberry, Irene D.
    Furler, John S.
    Young, Doris
    Best, James D.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2009, 191 (09) : 492 - 495
  • [4] Communicating BRCA research results to patients enrolled in international clinical trials: lessons learnt from the AGO-OVAR 16 study
    Pulford, David J.
    Harter, Philipp
    Floquet, Anne
    Barrett, Catherine
    Suh, Dong Hoon
    Friedlander, Michael
    Arranz, Jose Angel
    Hasegawa, Kosei
    Tada, Hiroomi
    Vuylsteke, Peter
    Mirza, Mansoor R.
    Donadello, Nicoletta
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Johnson, Toby
    Cox, Charles
    Chan, John K.
    Imhof, Martin
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Calvert, Paula
    Wimberger, Pauline
    Berton-Rigaud, Dominique
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    Elser, Gabriele
    Xu, Chun-Fang
    du Bois, Andreas
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17