The validity of the EQ-5D-5L in measuring quality of life benefits of breast reconstruction

被引:17
作者
Kouwenberg, Casimir A. E. [1 ,2 ]
Kranenburg, Leonieke W. [2 ]
Visser, Martijn S. [2 ]
Busschbach, Jan J. [2 ]
Mureau, Marc A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Psychiat, Sect Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Breast reconstruction; EQ-5D; Outcome assessment (health care); Quality of life; Mastectomy; Cost-benefit analysis; MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; CANCER; HEALTH; WOMEN; FLAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2018.08.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The EuroQol EQ-5D-5L instrument is the most widely used quality of life (QoL) measure in health economic evaluations. It is unclear whether such a generic instrument is valid enough to estimate the benefits of breast reconstruction (BR), given the specific changes observed in QoL after BR. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients who had undergone postmastectomy BR. Methods: In a 10-year cross-sectional cohort study, 463 mastectomy patients completed an online survey: 202 patients with autologous-BR (A-BR), 103 with implant-based-BR (I-BR), and 158 without BR (MAS). The results were used to evaluate the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L with respect to the ceiling effect and to known-group, convergent, and discriminant validity, by comparing it with the Breast-Q, the cancer-specific (EORTC-QLQ-C30), and breast cancer-specific (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) questionnaires. Results: The EQ-5D-5L was able to discriminate between patients with and without complications, MAS with or without BR and MAS versus the general population. It was, however, not able to discriminate between A-BR vs. I-BR as well as BR vs. general population. It is not clear whether this was due to the insensitivity of the instrument, insufficient sample sizes, or because there were no actual differences in QoL between these groups. Good convergent and discriminant validity of both the EQ-5D-5L and its individual dimensions were demonstrated. Additional support for the instrument's validity was revealed by moderate correlations between the generic EQ-5D-5L and specific QoL aspects of BR such as sexuality and body image. Conclusions: The results of this study support the validity of the EQ-5D-5L as an outcome measure in health economic evaluations of BR. (C) 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 61
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal
  • [3] Brazier J., 2011, NICE DSU technical support document 8: An introduction to the measurement and valuation of health for NICE submissions
  • [4] PREFERENCE-BASED CONDITION-SPECIFIC MEASURES OF HEALTH: WHAT HAPPENS TO CROSS PROGRAMME COMPARABILITY?
    Brazier, John
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [5] Briggs AH, 2006, Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation
  • [6] Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching
    Caliendo, Marco
    Kopeinig, Sabine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2008, 22 (01) : 31 - 72
  • [7] CCMO, 2018, YOUR RES DOES IT FAL
  • [8] Measuring Quality of Life in Oncologic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Chen, Constance M.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    King, Tari
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (06) : 587 - 597
  • [9] Cohen JW., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
  • [10] The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015
    Cohen, Wess A.
    Mundy, Lily R.
    Ballard, Tiffany N. S.
    Klassen, Anne
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Browne, John
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (02) : 149 - 162