Comparative evaluation of the Brucella Coombs gel test in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis

被引:3
|
作者
Koroglu, Mehmet [1 ,2 ]
Aydemir, Ozlem Akkaya [2 ]
Demiray, Tayfur [2 ]
Erkorkmaz, Unal [3 ]
Ozbek, Ahmet [1 ,2 ]
Altindis, Mustafa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med Microbiol, Sakarya, Turkey
[2] Sakarya Univ, Res & Educ Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol Lab, Sakarya, Turkey
[3] Sakarya Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Sakarya, Turkey
关键词
Bacterial infection; diagnosis; equipment; brucellosis; SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1080/13102818.2016.1190945
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Brucellosis is widespread among humans and animals. Diagnosis of brucellosis mostly depends on serological methods. Serological tests are preferred over time-consuming and hazardous bacterial cultures in routine laboratory practice. However, these tests are somehow challenging due to "incomplete/blocking antibodies' that prevent agglutination. Brucella Coombs gel test (BCGT) is newly developed test that contains Coombs antibodies (anti-human IgG) in gel microtubes and depends on gel centrifugation methods for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Here, performance of the BCGT is compared with standard serum tube agglutination (STA), standard serum tube agglutination with Coombs (C-STA) and immune capture agglutination (Brucellacapt). In total, 78 positive samples for study group and 16 samples for the control group were enrolled in the study. The samples were tested at dilutions of 1:40-1:5120. Titres at 1:160 and above were considered positive for brucellosis, whereas those lower than 1:160 were considered negative. Excellent agreement levels were determined between BCGT test and C-STA (kappa, 0.894; p < 0.001), and BCGT and Brucellacapt (kappa, 0.802; p < 0.001), when the diagnostic titre was accepted as 1:160. BCGT is easy to apply and interpret and provides reliable titre results in less than 2 h. It is also advantageous for screening.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 975
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of a Novel Test (ODAK Brucella Coombs Gel Test) with Commonly Used Serological Tests in Human Brucellosis
    Borsa, Baris Ata
    Aldag, Mehmet Ersoy
    Yilmaz, Meric
    Dalar, Zeynep Gungordu
    Ozalp, Veli Cengiz
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2016, 62 (09) : 1671 - 1674
  • [2] Comparison of a New and Rapid Method, Brucella Coombs Gel Test With the Other Methods in the Serological Diagnosis of Brucellosis
    Irvem, Arzu
    Yucel, Fatma Muhterem
    Aksaray, Sabahat
    Bor, Emire
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2015, 49 (02): : 181 - 187
  • [3] Comparison of standard agglutination tests, enzyme immunoassay, and Coombs gel test used in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis
    Kocman, Emine Emel
    Erensoy, Memnune Selda
    Tasbakan, Meltem
    Ciceklioglu, Meltem
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [4] Can the Brucellacapt® test be substituted for the Coombs test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis?
    Serra, J
    Velasco, J
    Godoy, P
    Mendoza, J
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2001, 19 (05): : 202 - 205
  • [5] Comparison of Coombs Gel Test with ELISA and Standard Tube Agglutination Tests Used in Serological Diagnosis of Brucellosis
    Kuyumcu, Cigdem Akalan
    Erol, Serpil
    Adaleti, Riza
    Senbayrak, Seniha
    Deniz, Secil
    Barkay, Orcun
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 2 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [6] Comparison of a New and Rapid Method: Brucella Coombs Gel Test With Other Diagnostic Tests
    Kalem, Fatma
    Ergun, Ayse Gul
    Durmaz, Suleyman
    Dogan, Metin
    Ertugrul, Omur
    Gundem, Seval
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2016, 30 (05) : 756 - 759
  • [7] Comparative analysis of the main outer membrane proteins of Brucella in the diagnosis of brucellosis
    Bai, Qiongqiong
    Li, Han
    Wu, Xiling
    Shao, Jihong
    Sun, Mingjun
    Yin, Dehui
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 560 : 126 - 131
  • [8] Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis
    Yagupsky, Pablo
    Morata, Pilar
    Colmenero, Juan D.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2020, 33 (01)
  • [9] Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis
    Araj, George F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 36 : S12 - S17
  • [10] Membrane polysaccharides of Brucella abortus 1119-3 in agar gel immunodifusion test in diagnosis of bovine brucellosis
    Megid, J
    Ribeiro, MG
    Agottani, JVB
    Marcos, G
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 1999, 51 (05) : 433 - 437