Land size and productivity in the livestock sector: evidence from pastoral areas in China

被引:9
作者
Xia, Fang [1 ]
Hou, Lingling [2 ]
Jin, Songqing [3 ,4 ]
Li, Dongqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Res Inst Global Value Chains, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, China Ctr Agr Policy, Sch Adv Agr Sci, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, 446 West Circle Dr,Rm 202, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Zhejiang Univ, China Acad Rural Dev, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; grassland; inverse relationship; labour market; land rental market; livestock; FARM SIZE; INVERSE PRODUCTIVITY; AFRICAN AGRICULTURE; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; RENTAL MARKETS; LABOR-MARKETS; POLICY; EXPLAIN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8489.12381
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article explores the relationship between land size and productivity in the livestock sector. Household panel data from pastoral areas in northwestern China were analysed. Results suggest an inverse relationship (IR) between land size and the number of livestock per ha. IR can be largely explained by labour input intensity, which is negatively correlated with land size. We find that household's labour demand is not separable from household's labour supply and households' decisions to rent land and hire labour for grazing are significantly related to the labour-land endowment ratio. These findings are consistent with the Chayanovian explanation that labour input intensity varies with farm size due to unobserved interhousehold variation in shadow wage rates. In addition, participation in the labour market does not significantly influence the IR for the employer, while the practice of land renting reduces, but does not eliminate, the IR for the lease. These findings point towards the potential for using factor markets to optimise pasture-based livestock production scale, and the need to promote the factor market development to achieve efficiency in resource use.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 888
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Correlated non-classical measurement errors, 'Second best' policy inference, and the inverse size-productivity relationship in agriculture [J].
Abay, Kibrom A. ;
Abate, Gashaw T. ;
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Bernard, Tanguy .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2019, 139 :171-184
[2]   Is There a Farm Size-Productivity Relationship in African Agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda [J].
Ali, Daniel Ayalew ;
Deininger, Klaus .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2015, 91 (02) :317-343
[3]   Food security policy options for China: Lessons from other countries [J].
Anderson, Kym ;
Strutt, Anna .
FOOD POLICY, 2014, 49 :50-58
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OECD FAO AGR OUTL 20
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHIN STAT YB 2017
[6]   Testing household-specific explanations for the inverse productivity relationship [J].
Assuncao, Juliano J. ;
Braido, Luis H. B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 89 (04) :980-990
[7]   SIZE, PRODUCTIVITY, AND RETURNS TO SCALE - ANALYSIS OF FARM-LEVEL DATA IN INDIAN AGRICULTURE [J].
BARDHAN, PK .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (06) :1370-1386
[8]   On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship [J].
Barrett, CB .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1996, 51 (02) :193-215
[9]   Shadow wages, allocative inefficiency, and labor supply in smallholder agriculture [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Sherlund, Shane M. ;
Adesina, Akinwumi A. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (01) :21-34
[10]   Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity-Size Relationship [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Hou, Janet Y. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (01) :88-97