Quantitative Analysis of Human Error Probability in High-Speed Railway Dispatching Tasks

被引:16
作者
Sun, Yanhao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qi [2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Zhiming [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Ying [2 ,3 ]
Ding, Shuxin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Railway Sci, Postgrad Dept, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Railway Sci Corp Ltd, Signal & Commun Res Inst, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Res Ctr Railway Intelligence Transportat Sys, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM); human error probability (HEP); common performance condition (CPC); high-speed railway dispatchers; 2-tuple linguistic term sets; evidential reasoning (ER); multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM); HUMAN RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACH; DECISION-MAKING; CREAM MODEL; FUZZY; QUANTIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981763
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Human error can be regarded as a significant factor contributing to high-speed railway accidents. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) is well-known approach applied to determine Human Error Probability (HEP). However, shortcomings are still disclosed and weaken the applicability of such approach. These include the lack of sufficient failure data, lack of valid description of Common Performance Condition (CPC) and does not consider the CPCs weights. In addition, Basic CREAM does not provide a method to calculate the concrete HEP. In this paper, a modified CREAM is proposed to assess HEP of high-speed railway dispatchers in dispatching tasks. The core of the modified method is to use 2-tuple linguistic term sets to describe CPCs evaluation, combine weighted CPCs by Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach, and adopt Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making (MAGDM) method to calculate HEP. To make CPCs weights more accurate, dynamically adjusting weights is adopted in this paper. The rationality and validity of the modified CREAM approach are verified by two axioms and compared other models. Finally this modified CREAM approach is applied to human reliability analysis of high-speed railway dispatchers.
引用
收藏
页码:56253 / 56266
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1983, HDB HUMAN RELIABILIT, DOI DOI 10.2172/5752058
  • [2] A CRITIQUE OF RECENT MODELS FOR HUMAN ERROR RATE ASSESSMENT
    APOSTOLAKIS, GE
    BIER, VM
    MOSLEH, A
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1988, 22 (1-4) : 201 - 217
  • [3] Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using an evidential network approach extended by belief rules and uncertainty measures
    Deng, Xinyang
    Jiang, Wen
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2018, 117 : 183 - 193
  • [4] Phoenix - A model-based Human Reliability Analysis methodology: Qualitative Analysis Procedure
    Ekanem, Nsimah J.
    Mosleh, Ali
    Shen, Song-Hua
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 145 : 301 - 315
  • [5] Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA
    Fujita, Y
    Hollnagel, E
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 83 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [6] A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application
    He, Xuhong
    Wang, Yao
    Shen, Zupei
    Huang, Xiangrui
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (02) : 298 - 306
  • [7] A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
    Herrera, F
    Martínez, L
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2000, 8 (06) : 746 - 752
  • [8] Hollnagel E., 1988, COGNITIVE RELIABILIT, V1st, P151
  • [9] Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy continuous weighted entropy and its application to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making
    Jin, Feifei
    Pei, Lidan
    Chen, Huayou
    Zhou, Ligang
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 59 : 132 - 141
  • [10] A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis
    Konstandinidou, M
    Nivolianitou, Z
    Kiranoudis, C
    Markatos, N
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2006, 91 (06) : 706 - 716