Approaches for making risk-based Go/No-Go decision for international projects

被引:134
|
作者
Han, SH
Diekmann, JE
机构
[1] Minist Constr & Transp, Seoul 427760, South Korea
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(300)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The world economy is becoming more global due to agreements such as the "Uruguay Round" in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The globalization of the construction industry provides tremendous opportunities for contractors to expand into new foreign markets. However, international construction involves all of the uncertainties common to domestic construction projects as well as risks specific to international transactions. Consequently, in opposition to the worldwide globalization trend, only 19% of the U.S. top 400 contractors actively seek international contracts. This paper discusses current approaches related to entry decisions into international construction markets. It then develops a comprehensive approach for making stable and systematic go/no-go decisions for international projects. Finally, a pilot study is used to demonstrate and validate the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 308
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessments of risky driving: A Go/No-Go simulator driving task to evaluate risky decision-making and associated behavioral patterns
    Ba, Yutao
    Zhang, Wei
    Salvendy, Gavriel
    Cheng, Andy S. K.
    Ventsislavova, Petya
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 52 : 265 - 274
  • [32] A "Backward" Bayesian Method for Determination of Criteria for Making Go/No-Go Decisions in the Early Phases
    Yin, Yin
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 9 (02): : 153 - 159
  • [33] The effect of an advisory system on pilots' go/no-go decision during take-off
    Bove, T
    Andersen, HB
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 75 (02) : 179 - 191
  • [35] RETHINKING DECISION MAKING: STEPS TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR RISK-BASED DECISION MAKING FOR BLOOD SAFETY
    Devine, D.
    MacPherson, J.
    Sher, G. D.
    Williamson, L.
    Shoos, Lipton K.
    Delage, G.
    Hamilton, S.
    McCullough, J.
    Tomasulo, P.
    McDonald, P.
    De Wit, J.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2011, 101 : 10 - 11
  • [36] Research on the System Structure of International NO-GO Game Platform
    He, Junjia
    Mei, Xian
    Qi, Junfan
    Lu, Zijian
    Zhang, Jiawen
    Liu, Pengfei
    2023 35TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC, 2023, : 2316 - 2320
  • [37] Use of computer assisted trial design (CATD) for a phase 2 go, no-go decision.
    Hermann, DJ
    Lockwood, PA
    Ewy, W
    Holford, NH
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 71 (02) : P57 - P57
  • [38] INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MANAGER AND THE COMMITMENT TO ENTRY: EMPIRICAL COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY ON THE ROLE OF MANAGERIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE FOREIGN ENTRANCE Go/No-Go DECISION
    Oortwijn, Maud
    3RD ANNUAL EUROMED CONFERENCE OF THE EUROMED ACADEMY OF BUSINESS: BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS ACROSS COUNTRIES AND CULTURES, 2010, : 743 - 759
  • [39] Risk-based decision making for dam safety
    Foster, JL
    MANAGING THE RISKS OF DAM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, SAFETY AND OPERATION, 1998, : 209 - 219
  • [40] Risk-Based Decision Making for Terrorism Applications
    Dillon, Robin L.
    Liebe, Robert M.
    Bestafka, Thomas
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (03) : 321 - 335