Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods

被引:11
|
作者
McKearney, Richard M. [1 ]
Bell, Steven L. [1 ]
Chesnaye, Michael A. [1 ]
Simpson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; Evoked potentials; Objective detection methods; Machine learning; OBJECTIVE DETECTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLASSIFICATION; TESTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods. Design: Four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling's T-2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data ("response present" or "response absent") to be known. Results: The sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes. Conclusions: The stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient's ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model's generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 960
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of Intrusions with Machine Learning Methods
    Bostanci, Beyzanur
    Albayrak, Ahmet
    2ND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATICS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IISEC), 2021,
  • [32] Statistical and Machine Learning Link Selection Methods for Brain Functional Networks: Review and Comparison
    Ivanoska, Ilinka
    Trivodaliev, Kire
    Kalajdziski, Slobodan
    Zanin, Massimiliano
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (06)
  • [33] Machine learning on difference image analysis: A comparison of methods for transient detection
    Sanchez, B.
    Dominguez R, M. J.
    Lares, M.
    Beroiz, M.
    Cabral, J. B.
    Gurovich, S.
    Quinones, C.
    Artola, R.
    Colazo, C.
    Schneiter, M.
    Girardini, C.
    Tornatore, M.
    Nilo Castellon, J. L.
    Garcia Lambas, D.
    Diaz, M. C.
    ASTRONOMY AND COMPUTING, 2019, 28
  • [34] Epileptic seizure detection using hybrid machine learning methods
    Subasi, Abdulhamit
    Kevric, Jasmin
    Canbaz, M. Abdullah
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (01) : 317 - 325
  • [35] Evaluation of acoustic detection of UAVs using machine learning methods
    Borghgraef, A.
    Vandewal, M.
    COUNTERTERRORISM, CRIME FIGHTING, FORENSICS, AND SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES III, 2019, 11166
  • [36] Detection of Cyberbullying in Social Networks Using Machine Learning Methods
    Altay, Elif Varol
    Alatas, Bilal
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON BIG DATA, DEEP LEARNING AND FIGHTING CYBER TERRORISM (IBIGDELFT), 2018, : 87 - 91
  • [37] Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction Using Machine Learning Methods
    Misra, Apurva
    Samuel, Siby
    Cao, Shi
    Shariatmadari, Khatereh
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 18000 - 18012
  • [38] A review of ADHD detection studies with machine learning methods using rsfMRI data
    Taspinar, Gurcan
    Ozkurt, Nalan
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 37 (08)
  • [39] Objective hearing threshold identification from auditory brainstem response measurements using supervised and self-supervised approaches
    Thalmeier, Dominik
    Miller, Gregor
    Schneltzer, Elida
    Hurt, Anja
    Becker, Lore
    Mueller, Christian L.
    Maier, Holger
    DeAngelis, Martin Hrabe
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [40] An Empirical Comparison of Fake News Detection using different Machine Learning Algorithms
    Albahr, Abdulaziz
    Albahar, Marwan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (09) : 146 - 152