Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods

被引:15
作者
McKearney, Richard M. [1 ]
Bell, Steven L. [1 ]
Chesnaye, Michael A. [1 ]
Simpson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; Evoked potentials; Objective detection methods; Machine learning; OBJECTIVE DETECTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLASSIFICATION; TESTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods. Design: Four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling's T-2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data ("response present" or "response absent") to be known. Results: The sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes. Conclusions: The stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient's ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model's generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 960
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Automatic classification of auditory brainstem responses using SVM-based feature selection algorithm for threshold detection [J].
Acir, N ;
Özdamar, Ö ;
Güzelis, C .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2006, 19 (02) :209-218
[2]  
ALPSAN D, 1991, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 13, PTS 1-5, P1425, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.1991.684525
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses
[4]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[5]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[6]   On wavelet analysis of auditory evoked potentials [J].
Bradley, AP ;
Wilson, WJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (05) :1114-1128
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]  
British Society of Audiology, 2019, RECOMMENDED PROCEDUR
[9]   Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials -: Comparison of statistical tests in the time and frequency domains [J].
Cebulla, M ;
Stürzebecher, E ;
Wernecke, KD .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) :44-51
[10]   Controlling test specificity for auditory evoked response detection using a frequency domain bootstrap [J].
Chesnaye, M. A. ;
Bell, S. L. ;
Harte, J. M. ;
Simpson, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2021, 363