Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation

被引:31
作者
Cordrey, Terry [1 ,2 ]
King, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Pilkington, Emma [1 ]
Gore, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Gustafson, Owen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford Allied Hlth Profess Res & Innovat Unit, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Ctr Movement Occupat & Rehabil Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mixed; methods; Research capacity; Allied health professional; Research; culture; Research activity;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Despite the myriad benefits of research to patients, professionals, and organisations, fewer than 0.1% of the Allied Health Professions workforce are employed in clinical academic roles. Identified barriers include a lack of role modelling, management support, funding, and availability of clinical academic roles. Research capacity building is critical to improving Allied Health Professional research capability. The aim of this evaluation was to explore the current research capacity and culture of Allied Health Professionals to inform future tailored research capacity building strategies at a local level. Methods A mixed methods evaluation of research capacity and culture was conducted within the Allied Health Professions department of a large National Health Service Foundation Trust using an online research capacity and culture questionnaire, followed by focus groups. Staff were recruited using a purposive method with the questionnaire and subsequent focus groups completed between July and September 2020. Data from the questionnaire was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and after inductive coding, focus group data was analysed thematically. Results 93 out of 278 staff completed the questionnaire and 60 staff members attended seven focus groups. The research capacity and culture survey reported the department's key strength as promoting clinical practice based on evidence (median=8, range=6-9). A key reported weakness of the department was insufficient resources to support staff research training (med=4, 3-6). Respondents considered themselves most skilled in finding relevant literature (med=6, 5-8) and least skilled at securing research funding (med=1, 1-2). Greater than half of the respondents (n=50) reported not currently being involved with research. Five themes were identified from the focus groups: empowerment; building research infrastructure; fostering research skills; access for all; and positive research culture. Conclusions Allied Health Professionals recognise the benefits of research at teams and departmental level, but marginally at an individual level. Local research capacity building strategies should aim to address the role, responsibilities and barriers to Allied Health Profession research development at an individual level. To ensure all staff can engage, research infrastructure and empowerment are essential.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]  
FUGARD AJB, 2015, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V18, P669, DOI DOI 10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453
[12]   A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective [J].
Golenko, Xanthe ;
Pager, Susan ;
Holden, Libby .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
[13]  
Guest G, 2012, APPL THEMATIC ANAL, DOI 10.4135/9781483384436
[14]  
Harris J., 2019, SHAPING BETTER PRACT
[15]   Interventions and strategies aimed at clinical academic pathway development for nurses in the United Kingdom: A systematised review of the literature [J].
Henshall, Catherine ;
Kozlowska, Olga ;
Walthall, Helen ;
Heinen, Anna ;
Smith, Rebecca ;
Carding, Paul .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (11-12) :1502-1518
[16]   Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation [J].
Hilder, Joanne ;
Mickan, Sharon ;
Noble, Christy ;
Weir, Kelly A. ;
Wenke, Rachel .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 18 (01)
[17]  
Hiley J., 2018, West Midlands Clinical Academic Careers Programmes for Nurses, Midwives, Allied Health Professions, Pharmacists and Healthcare Scientists (NMAHPPS)
[18]   Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels [J].
Holden, Libby ;
Pager, Susan ;
Golenko, Xanthe ;
Ware, Robert S. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2012, 18 (01) :62-67
[19]   Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross-sectional study [J].
Jonker, Leon ;
Fisher, Stacey Jayne ;
Dagnan, Dave .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (01) :203-208
[20]   Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide [J].
Kallio, Hanna ;
Pietila, Anna-Maija ;
Johnson, Martin ;
Kangasniemi, Mari .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (12) :2954-2965