A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction

被引:25
作者
Goktay, Ozgen [1 ]
Satilmis, Tulin [1 ]
Garip, Hasan [1 ]
Gonul, Onur [1 ]
Goker, Kamil [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, TR-34365 Istanbul, Marmara, Turkey
关键词
PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION; PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; TRAMADOL; REMIFENTANIL; COMBINATION; 3RD-MOLAR; RECOVERY; FENTANYL; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-mu g/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. Results: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. Conclusions: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1594-1599, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1599
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   RETRACTED: Preoperative intravenous tramadol versus ketorolac for preventing postoperative pain after third molar surgery (Retracted Article) [J].
Ong, KS ;
Tan, JML .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 33 (03) :274-278
[22]   Propofol and fentanyl compared with midazolam and fentanyl during third molar surgery [J].
Parworth, LP ;
Frost, DE ;
Zuniga, JR ;
Bennett, T .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (04) :447-453
[23]   Patient-controlled sedation: A comparison of sedation prior to and until the end of minor oral surgery [J].
Rodrigo, C ;
Chow, KC .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1996, 41 (03) :159-163
[24]  
Rodrigo C R, 1990, Anesth Prog, V37, P20
[25]   CARDIAC DYSRHYTHMIAS ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAVENOUS LORAZEPAM, DIAZEPAM, AND MIDAZOLAM DURING ORAL-SURGERY [J].
ROELOFSE, JA ;
VANDERBIJL, P .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (03) :247-250
[26]  
SIEVERS TD, 1991, PEDIATRICS, V88, P1172
[27]   Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions [J].
Wilson, KE ;
Girdler, NM ;
Welbury, RR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (06) :850-856
[28]   PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION USING MIDAZOLAM [J].
ZACHARIAS, M ;
HUNTER, KM ;
LUYK, NH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 32 (03) :168-173
[29]   Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Zeyneloglu, P. ;
Pirat, A. ;
Candan, S. ;
Kuyumcu, S. ;
Tekin, I. ;
Arslan, G. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (12) :961-967