A Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl and Midazolam/Tramadol for Conscious Intravenous Sedation During Third Molar Extraction

被引:25
作者
Goktay, Ozgen [1 ]
Satilmis, Tulin [1 ]
Garip, Hasan [1 ]
Gonul, Onur [1 ]
Goker, Kamil [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, TR-34365 Istanbul, Marmara, Turkey
关键词
PATIENT-CONTROLLED SEDATION; PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; TRAMADOL; REMIFENTANIL; COMBINATION; 3RD-MOLAR; RECOVERY; FENTANYL; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of fentanyl and tramadol, used in combination, as sedation for third molar surgical extraction. Patients and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 60 patients undergoing extraction of a horizontal third molar with an Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale score above 10 points. All of the patients were first given a 0.03-mg/kg bolus of midazolam, and then they were randomized into 3 groups: group A, midazolam only; group B, midazolam and 1-mu g/kg fentanyl; and group C, midazolam and 1-mg/kg tramadol. The vital signs were recorded. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain and adverse effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction was assessed. Results: No differences were found in the heart rate among groups (P > .05). The mean blood pressure was also similar until the 40th minute, after which the mean blood pressure in the patients in group A was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P < .01). In the postoperative pain assessment, the visual analog scale scores of the patients in group C were lower than those in the other 2 groups in the first postoperative hour (P < .05). The time at which the first rescue analgesic was taken in groups A, B, and C was 3, 3.5, and 5 hours postoperatively, respectively, and was significantly later in group C (P < .01). No difference was found in patient/surgeon satisfaction among the groups. Conclusions: Tramadol has a better analgesic effect in third molar surgery than fentanyl and placebo. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1594-1599, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1599
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ahmed Aliya, 2007, J Pak Med Assoc, V57, P548
[2]  
Broome IJ, 1999, ANAESTHESIA, V54, P289
[3]   The effect of tramadol on dento-alveolar surgical pain [J].
Collins, M ;
Young, I ;
Sweeney, P ;
Fenn, GC ;
Stratford, ME ;
Wilson, A ;
Harris, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 35 (01) :54-58
[4]  
De Witte JL, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P1319
[5]  
Demiraran Y, 2006, TURK J OBSTET GYNECO, V3, P191
[6]   PATIENTS ANXIETIES WITH 3RD MOLAR SURGERY [J].
EARL, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 32 (05) :293-297
[7]   Evaluation of patient-controlled remifentanil application in third molar surgery [J].
Esen, E ;
Üstün, Y ;
Balcioglu, YO ;
Alparslan, ZN .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (04) :457-463
[8]   A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars [J].
Garip, Hasan ;
Guerkan, Yavuz ;
Toker, Kamil ;
Goeker, Kamil .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (03) :212-216
[9]   Clinical pharmacology of tramadol [J].
Grond, S ;
Sablotzki, A .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2004, 43 (13) :879-923
[10]   Fentanyl or tramadol, with midazolam, for outpatient colonoscopy: Analgesia, sedation, and safety [J].
Hirsh, Irina ;
Vaissler, Alexander ;
Chernin, Josef ;
Segol, Ori ;
Pizov, Reuven .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (11) :1946-1951