Randomized Phase III and Extension Studies of Naldemedine in Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation and Cancer

被引:95
|
作者
Katakami, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Harada, Toshiyuki [2 ]
Murata, Toru [3 ]
Shinozaki, Katsunori [4 ]
Tsutsumi, Masakazu [5 ]
Yokota, Takaaki [6 ]
Arai, Masatsugu [6 ]
Tada, Yukio [6 ]
Narabayashi, Masaru [7 ]
Boku, Narikazu [8 ]
机构
[1] Inst Biomed Res & Innovat Hosp, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Japan Community Healthcare Org Hokkaido Hosp, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Aichi Hosp, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Prefectural Hosp, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
[6] Shionogi & Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan
[7] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
PREVALENCE; NALOXEGOL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids-common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1: 1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (>= 3 SBMs/week and an increase of >= 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3859 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phase II trial of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone in the treatment of severe opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in cancer patients: an exploratory study
    Mori, Masanori
    Ji, Yongli
    Kumar, Santosh
    Ashikaga, Takamaru
    Ades, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 22 (02) : 397 - 404
  • [32] Impact and Consequences of Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Survey of Patients
    Giustino Varrassi
    Vivek Banerji
    Walter Gianni
    Franco Marinangeli
    Carmine Pinto
    Pain and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 1139 - 1153
  • [33] Constipation in Elderly Patients with Noncancer Pain: Focus on Opioid-Induced Constipation
    Chokhavatia, Sita
    John, Elizabeth S.
    Bridgeman, Mary Barna
    Dixit, Deepali
    DRUGS & AGING, 2016, 33 (08) : 557 - 574
  • [34] Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Noncancer Pain
    Chey, William D.
    Webster, Lynn
    Sostek, Mark
    Lappalainen, Jaakko
    Barker, Peter N.
    Tack, Jan
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (25) : 2387 - 2396
  • [35] Long-term use of naldemedine in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study
    Webster, Lynn R.
    Nalamachu, Srinivas
    Morlion, Bart
    Reddy, Jyotsna
    Baba, Yuko
    Yamada, Tadaaki
    Ferreira, Juan C. Arjona
    PAIN, 2018, 159 (05) : 987 - 994
  • [36] The management of strong opioid-induced constipation in neoplastic patients
    Rahnea-Nita, Roxana-Andreea
    Badiu, Cristinel Dumitru
    Ciuhu, Anda Natalia
    Mandu, Mihaela
    Andronache, Liliana Florina
    Grigorean, Valentin Titus
    Spircu, Tiberiu
    Suceveanu, Adrian Paul
    Gherghiceanu, Florentina
    Nitipir, Cornelia
    Smarandache, Catalin Gabriel
    Rahnea-Nita, Gabriela
    ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2020, 25 (03): : 1563 - 1571
  • [37] Naldemedine is associated with earlier defecation in critically ill patients with opioid-induced constipation: A retrospective, single-center cohort study
    Nishiyama, Seiya
    Uchino, Shigehiko
    Sasabuchi, Yusuke
    Masuyama, Tomoyuki
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Sanui, Masamitsu
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [38] Naloxegol for managing opioid-induced constipation
    Shelton, Krystal N.
    Clements, Jennifer N.
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2017, 30 (09): : 51 - 53
  • [39] Methylnaltrexone: Treatment for Opioid-Induced Constipation
    Licup, Nerissa
    Baumrucker, Steven J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (01) : 59 - 61
  • [40] Overview and Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation
    McCarberg, Bill H.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2013, 125 (04) : 7 - 17