Benchmarking quantum processors with a single qubit

被引:2
|
作者
Goktas, Oktay [1 ,2 ]
Tham, Weng Kian [1 ]
Bonsma-Fisher, Kent [1 ,3 ]
Brodutch, Aharon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, Ctr Quantum Informat & Quantum Control, 60 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
[2] Agnostiq Labs, 100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1L5, Canada
[3] Natl Res Council Canada, 100 Sussex Dr, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Edward S Rogers Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 10 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Quantum benchmarking; DQC1; Jones polynomials; NISQ; IBM; ALGORITHM; SUPREMACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11128-020-02642-4
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The first generation of small noisy quantum processors have recently become available to non-specialists who are not required to understand specifics of the physical platforms and, in particular, the types and sources of noise. As such, it is useful to benchmark the performance of such computers against specific tasks that may be of interest to users, ideally keeping both the circuit depth and width as free parameters. Here, we benchmark the IBM quantum experience using the deterministic quantum computing with 1 qubit (DQC1) algorithm originally proposed by Knill and Laflamme in the context of liquid-state NMR. In the first set of experiments, we use DQC1 as a trace estimation algorithm to benchmark performance with respect to circuit depth. In the second set, we use this trace estimation algorithm to distinguish between knots, a classically difficult task which is known to be complete for DQC1. Our results indicate that the main limiting factor is the depth of the circuit and that both random and systematic errors become an issue when the gate count increases. Surprisingly, we find that at the same gate count wider circuits perform better, probably due to randomization of coherent errors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the general constraints in single qubit quantum process tomography
    Bhandari, Ramesh
    Peters, Nicholas A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [42] Simulation of single-qubit open quantum systems
    Sweke, Ryan
    Sinayskiy, Ilya
    Petruccione, Francesco
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2014, 90 (02):
  • [43] Quantum synchronization of a single trapped-ion qubit
    Zhang, Liyun
    Wang, Zhao
    Wang, Yucheng
    Zhang, Junhua
    Wu, Zhigang
    Jie, Jianwen
    Lu, Yao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2023, 5 (03):
  • [44] Reconstructing the quantum state of oscillator networks with a single qubit
    Tufarelli, Tommaso
    Ferraro, Alessandro
    Kim, M. S.
    Bose, Sougato
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 85 (03):
  • [45] Extracavity quantum vacuum radiation from a single qubit
    De Liberato, S.
    Gerace, D.
    Carusotto, I.
    Ciuti, C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 80 (05):
  • [46] Blind Quantum Computation Using Single Qubit Gates
    Xing, Zheng
    Machado, Penousal
    Lam, Chan-Tong
    2022 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKS (ICICN 2022), 2022, : 264 - 269
  • [47] Comment on "Experimental single qubit quantum secret sharing"
    He, Guang Ping
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (02)
  • [48] A didactic approach to quantum machine learning with a single qubit
    Tapia, Elena Pena
    Scarpa, Giannicola
    Pozas-Kerstjens, Alejandro
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2023, 98 (05)
  • [49] Nonadiabatic single-qubit quantum Otto engine
    Solfanelli, Andrea
    Falsetti, Marco
    Campisi, Michele
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2020, 101 (05)
  • [50] Quantum state tomography of a single qubit: comparison of methods
    Schmied, Roman
    JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2016, 63 (18) : 1744 - 1758