Benchmarking quantum processors with a single qubit

被引:2
|
作者
Goktas, Oktay [1 ,2 ]
Tham, Weng Kian [1 ]
Bonsma-Fisher, Kent [1 ,3 ]
Brodutch, Aharon [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys, Ctr Quantum Informat & Quantum Control, 60 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada
[2] Agnostiq Labs, 100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1L5, Canada
[3] Natl Res Council Canada, 100 Sussex Dr, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Edward S Rogers Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 10 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Quantum benchmarking; DQC1; Jones polynomials; NISQ; IBM; ALGORITHM; SUPREMACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11128-020-02642-4
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The first generation of small noisy quantum processors have recently become available to non-specialists who are not required to understand specifics of the physical platforms and, in particular, the types and sources of noise. As such, it is useful to benchmark the performance of such computers against specific tasks that may be of interest to users, ideally keeping both the circuit depth and width as free parameters. Here, we benchmark the IBM quantum experience using the deterministic quantum computing with 1 qubit (DQC1) algorithm originally proposed by Knill and Laflamme in the context of liquid-state NMR. In the first set of experiments, we use DQC1 as a trace estimation algorithm to benchmark performance with respect to circuit depth. In the second set, we use this trace estimation algorithm to distinguish between knots, a classically difficult task which is known to be complete for DQC1. Our results indicate that the main limiting factor is the depth of the circuit and that both random and systematic errors become an issue when the gate count increases. Surprisingly, we find that at the same gate count wider circuits perform better, probably due to randomization of coherent errors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FEW-QUBIT MAGNETIC RESONANCE QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSORS: SIMULATING CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
    Criger, Ben
    Park, Daniel
    Baugh, Jonathan
    QUANTUM INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION FOR CHEMISTRY, 2014, 154 : 193 - 227
  • [32] High-Speed Calibration and Characterization of Superconducting Quantum Processors without Qubit Reset
    Werninghaus, M.
    Egger, D. J.
    Filipp, S.
    PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (02):
  • [33] Practical Approximation of Single-Qubit Unitaries by Single-Qubit Quantum Clifford and T Circuits
    Kliuchnikov, Vadym
    Maslov, Dmitri
    Mosca, Michele
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2016, 65 (01) : 161 - 172
  • [34] Knotted Picture of Single Qubit Quantum Logic Gate
    GU Zhi-Yu~1 QIAN Shang-Wu~21 Physics Department
    Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2009, 51 (05) : 769 - 772
  • [35] Single-qubit operations on the Kane quantum computer
    Wellard, CJ
    Hollenberg, LCL
    Pakes, CI
    NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) : 570 - 575
  • [36] Single-qubit reaped quantum state tomography
    Mahn-Soo Choi
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [37] Knotted Picture of Single Qubit Quantum Logic Gate
    Gu Zhi-Yu
    Qian Shang-Wu
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 51 (05) : 769 - 772
  • [38] Extracavity quantum vacuum radiation from a single qubit
    Laboratoire Matériaux et Phénomènes Quantiques, Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, UMR 7162, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Phys Rev A, 5
  • [39] Tomography of Optical Single-Qubit Quantum Memory
    Bantysh, B., I
    Katamadze, K. G.
    Bogdanov, Yu, I
    Gerasimov, K., I
    Minnegaliev, M. M.
    Urmancheev, R., V
    Moiseev, S. A.
    JETP LETTERS, 2022, 116 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [40] Threshold quantum secret sharing based on single qubit
    Changbin Lu
    Fuyou Miao
    Keju Meng
    Yue Yu
    Quantum Information Processing, 2018, 17