Reconstruction of Mandibular Segmental Detects Using Transport Disk Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Tao [1 ]
Man, Yi [2 ]
Bi, Ruiye [1 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Li, Yunfeng [1 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral Implantol,State Key Lab Oral Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mandible; reconstruction; segmental defects; transport disk distraction osteogenesis; BONE; DEFECTS; REGENERATION; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become an important alternative for bone defect reconstruction. The study aims to investigate the clinical feasibility and efficiency of transport disc DO (TDDO) for reconstruction of segmental defect of mandible and further dental implant treatment. Methods: A serial of 6 patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma or keratocystic odontogenic tumor were included in this study. Computed tomography (CT) scanning and panoramic radiograph were performed for preoperative evaluation and surgery planning. Transport disc DO was applied simultaneously with tumor resection for reconstruction of mandibular defects. The postoperative panoramic radiographs and CT scans were taken for evaluation of the ossification level. Then a second surgery was performed for removal of the distraction apparatus. Bone graft and rigid internal fixation were also used to fill the gap between the transport disc and the stump of the residual ramus. Further dental implant treatment was also finished or in progress. Results: All patients finished the whole treatment period, and no distraction device failure or tumor recurrence occurred. The distraction length ranged from 35 to 48 mm and the whole treatment period of TDDO ranged from 21 to 33 weeks. High degree of ossification was confirmed at the end of treatment by postoperative radiographs and intraoperative observation. Infection occurred in 1 of the 6 patients, and the symptom was controlled by surgical dressing change and flushing. Results of final facial profile in all patients were good. Three patients finished dental implant treatment with good occlusion. Conclusion: Results in this study suggest the clinical feasibility and efficiency of TDDO for reconstruction of segmental defect of mandible and further dental implant treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2088 / 2092
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomechanical Performance of Biodegradable Screw Fixation in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Firriolo, Joseph Mark
    Xue, Yunfeng
    Weyerbacher, Jonathan S.
    Saldana, Golddy M.
    Garfinkel, Alec
    Garcia, Tanya C.
    Arzi, Boaz
    Wong, Granger B.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (07) : 2228 - 2231
  • [32] Tenants of Mandibular Reconstruction in Segmental Defects
    Bevans, Scott
    Hammer, Daniel
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 56 (04) : 653 - 670
  • [33] Effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on developing molars
    Kleine-Hakala, M.
    Hukki, J.
    Hurmerinta, K.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2007, 10 (04) : 196 - 202
  • [34] Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Hassan, Bashar
    Jacob, DeAsia Dominique
    Sisti, Andrea
    Zahler, Stacey
    Rampazzo, Antonio
    Gharb, Bahar Bassiri
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (03) : E256 - E258
  • [35] Evaluation of Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Maxillofacial Region
    Vishwakarma, Ajit Kumar
    Dhiman, Neeraj Kumar
    Sharma, Naresh Kumar
    Jaiswara, Chandresh
    Tiwari, Preeti
    Hirani, Mehul Shashikant
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2025, 24 (01): : 188 - 199
  • [36] Use of three-dimensional printing to assess transport vectors in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Shah, Sagar
    O'Connor, Rory
    Watson, Jason
    Srinivasan, Dilip
    Sidebottom, Andrew
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (01): : 74 - 76
  • [37] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis by sagittal split osteotomy and intraoral curvilinear distraction
    Schendel, SA
    Linck, DW
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (04) : 631 - 635
  • [38] Helical distraction is superior to linear and circular distraction in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an in silico study
    Gateno, J.
    Kim, D.
    Bartlett, S.
    Deng, H. H.
    Xu, J.
    Xia, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 53 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [39] Mandible reconstruction with transport-disc distraction osteogenesis in children of deciduous dentition
    Liu, Y.
    Chen, J.
    Yan, F.
    Ping, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (10) : 1223 - 1228
  • [40] Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis for developmental deformities: a systematic review of the literature
    Verlinden, C. R. A.
    van de Vijfeijken, S. E. C. M.
    Tuinzing, D. B.
    Jansma, E. P.
    Becking, A. G.
    Swennen, G. R. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (01) : 44 - 49