Reconstruction of Mandibular Segmental Detects Using Transport Disk Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Tao [1 ]
Man, Yi [2 ]
Bi, Ruiye [1 ]
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Li, Yunfeng [1 ]
Zhu, Songsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral Implantol,State Key Lab Oral Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mandible; reconstruction; segmental defects; transport disk distraction osteogenesis; BONE; DEFECTS; REGENERATION; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become an important alternative for bone defect reconstruction. The study aims to investigate the clinical feasibility and efficiency of transport disc DO (TDDO) for reconstruction of segmental defect of mandible and further dental implant treatment. Methods: A serial of 6 patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma or keratocystic odontogenic tumor were included in this study. Computed tomography (CT) scanning and panoramic radiograph were performed for preoperative evaluation and surgery planning. Transport disc DO was applied simultaneously with tumor resection for reconstruction of mandibular defects. The postoperative panoramic radiographs and CT scans were taken for evaluation of the ossification level. Then a second surgery was performed for removal of the distraction apparatus. Bone graft and rigid internal fixation were also used to fill the gap between the transport disc and the stump of the residual ramus. Further dental implant treatment was also finished or in progress. Results: All patients finished the whole treatment period, and no distraction device failure or tumor recurrence occurred. The distraction length ranged from 35 to 48 mm and the whole treatment period of TDDO ranged from 21 to 33 weeks. High degree of ossification was confirmed at the end of treatment by postoperative radiographs and intraoperative observation. Infection occurred in 1 of the 6 patients, and the symptom was controlled by surgical dressing change and flushing. Results of final facial profile in all patients were good. Three patients finished dental implant treatment with good occlusion. Conclusion: Results in this study suggest the clinical feasibility and efficiency of TDDO for reconstruction of segmental defect of mandible and further dental implant treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2088 / 2092
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of Mandibular Hypoplasia Using Distraction Osteogenesis Technique
    陶学金
    樊敏
    凌翔
    陈卫民
    华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版), 2004, (01) : 92 - 94
  • [22] Management of mandibular hypoplasia using distraction osteogenesis technique
    Tao Xuejin
    Fan min
    Ling Xiang
    Chen Weimin
    Current Medical Science, 2004, 24 (1) : 92 - 94
  • [23] An Isogenic Model of Murine Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Deshpande, Sagar S.
    Weiss, Daniela M.
    Donneys, Alexis
    Gallagher, Katherine K.
    Tchanque-Fossuo, Catherine N.
    Sarhaddi, Deniz
    Buchman, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 540 - 544
  • [24] Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Mandibular Bone Regenerated By Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Zapata, Uriel
    Zakhary, Ibrahim
    Nagy, William W.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 89 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [25] Reconstruction of large mandibular and surrounding soft-tissue defects using distraction with bone transport
    Zwetyenga, N.
    Siberchicot, F.
    Emparanza, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (10) : 1215 - 1222
  • [26] Mandibular reconstruction after excision of recurrent odontogenic keratocyst using a novel mandibular distraction osteogenesis method– a case report
    Haiyun Lin
    Xiaoxia Zhong
    Nuo Zhou
    Xuan-Ping Huang
    Head & Face Medicine, 19
  • [27] Is acute compression and distraction superior to segmental bone transport techniques in chronic tibial osteomyelitis ? Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis Techniques
    Eralp, Levent
    Balci, Halil Ibrahim
    Kocaoglu, Mehmet
    Sen, Cengiz
    Celiktas, Mustafa
    Tomak, Yilmaz
    Gulsen, Mahir
    Dikmen, Goksel
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2016, 82 (03): : 599 - 609
  • [28] Transport Distraction Osteogenesis for Maxillomandibular Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Applications
    Neelakandan R.S.
    Bhargava D.
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2012, 11 (3) : 291 - 299
  • [29] A mathematical model for mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Schendel, SA
    Heegaard, JH
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 7 (06) : 465 - 468
  • [30] Osseointegration of Dental Implants Placed into Canine Mandibular Bone Regenerated by Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Zakhary, Ibrahim
    Nagy, William W.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : 677 - 686