Atmospheric observations inform CO2 flux responses to enviroclimatic drivers

被引:21
|
作者
Fang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Michalak, Anna M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
net ecosystem exchange (NEE); enviroclimatic drivers; biospheric CO2 flux responses; geostatistical inverse modeling; terrestrial biospheric model; spatiotemporal variability; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; CARBON-DIOXIDE; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; GROWTH-RATES; TERRESTRIAL; TEMPERATURE; EXCHANGE; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; FLUORESCENCE;
D O I
10.1002/2014GB005034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the response of the terrestrial biospheric carbon cycle to variability in enviroclimatic drivers is critical for predicting climate-carbon interactions. Here we apply an atmospheric-inversion-based framework to assess the relationships between the spatiotemporal patterns of net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE) and those of enviroclimatic drivers. We show that those relationships can be directly observed at 1 degrees x1 degrees 3-hourly resolution from atmospheric CO2 measurements for four of seven large biomes in North America, namely, (i) boreal forests and taiga; (ii) temperate coniferous forests; (iii) temperate grasslands, savannas, and shrublands; and (iv) temperate broadleaf and mixed forests. We find that shortwave radiation plays a dominant role during the growing season over all four biomes. Specific humidity and precipitation also play key roles and are associated with decreased CO2 uptake (or increased release). The explanatory power of specific humidity is especially strong during transition seasons, while that of precipitation appears during both the growing and dormant seasons. We further find that the ability of four prototypical terrestrial biospheric models (TBMs) to represent the spatiotemporal variability of NEE improves as the influence of radiation becomes more dominant, implying that TBMs have a better skill in representing the impact of radiation relative to other drivers. Even so, we show that TBMs underestimate the strength of the relationship to radiation and do not fully capture its seasonality. Furthermore, the TBMs appear to misrepresent the relationship to precipitation and specific humidity at the examined scales, with relationships that are not consistent in terms of sign, seasonality, or significance relative to observations. More broadly, we demonstrate the feasibility of directly probing relationships between NEE and enviroclimatic drivers at scales with no direct measurements of NEE, opening the door to the study of emergent processes across scales and to the evaluation of their scaling within TBMs.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 566
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observations and simulations of synoptic, regional, and local variations in atmospheric CO2
    Wang, Jih-Wang
    Denning, A. Scott
    Lu, Lixin
    Baker, Ian T.
    Corbin, Katherine D.
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D4)
  • [2] Revisiting the choice of the driving temperature for eddy covariance CO2 flux partitioning
    Wohlfahrt, Georg
    Galvagno, Marta
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 237 : 135 - 142
  • [3] Forecasting global atmospheric CO2
    Agusti-Panareda, A.
    Massart, S.
    Chevallier, F.
    Boussetta, S.
    Balsamo, G.
    Beljaars, A.
    Ciais, P.
    Deutscher, N. M.
    Engelen, R.
    Jones, L.
    Kivi, R.
    Paris, J. -D.
    Peuch, V. -H.
    Sherlock, V.
    Vermeulen, A. T.
    Wennberg, P. O.
    Wunch, D.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (21) : 11959 - 11983
  • [4] Evaluating the Arabian Sea as a regional source of atmospheric CO2: seasonal variability and drivers
    de Verneil, Alain
    Lachkar, Zouhair
    Smith, Shafer
    Levy, Marina
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 19 (03) : 907 - 929
  • [5] Assessing the magnitude of CO2 flux uncertainty in atmospheric CO2 records using products from NASA's Carbon Monitoring Flux Pilot Project
    Ott, Lesley E.
    Pawson, Steven
    Collatz, George J.
    Gregg, Watson W.
    Menemenlis, Dimitris
    Brix, Holger
    Rousseaux, Cecile S.
    Bowman, Kevin W.
    Liu, Junjie
    Eldering, Annmarie
    Gunson, Michael R.
    Kawa, Stephan R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2015, 120 (02) : 734 - 765
  • [6] A biogenic CO2 flux adjustment scheme for the mitigation of large-scale biases in global atmospheric CO2 analyses and forecasts
    Agusti-Panareda, Anna
    Massart, Sebastien
    Chevallier, Frederic
    Balsamo, Gianpaolo
    Boussetta, Souhail
    Dutra, Emanuel
    Beljaars, Anton
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (16) : 10399 - 10418
  • [7] Monitoring and interpreting the ocean uptake of atmospheric CO2
    Watson, Andrew J.
    Metzl, Nicolas
    Schuster, Ute
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2011, 369 (1943): : 1997 - 2008
  • [8] On the causes of trends in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2
    Piao, Shilong
    Liu, Zhuo
    Wang, Yilong
    Ciais, Philippe
    Yao, Yitong
    Peng, Shushi
    Chevallier, Frederic
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Janssens, Ivan A.
    Penuelas, Josep
    Sitch, Stephen
    Wang, Tao
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : 608 - 616
  • [9] Assessing CO2 sink/source strength of a degraded temperate peatland: atmospheric and hydrological drivers and responses to extreme events
    Evrendilek, Fatih
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2015, 8 (08) : 1429 - 1445
  • [10] Drivers of Atmosphere-Ocean CO2 Flux in Northern Norwegian Fjords
    Aalto, Nerea J.
    Campbell, Karley
    Eilertsen, Hans C.
    Bernstein, Hans C.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8