The influence of carbon tax on CO2 rebound effect and welfare in Chinese households

被引:22
作者
Chen, Qian [1 ,2 ]
Zha, Donglan [1 ,2 ]
Salman, Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon taxation; Rebound effect; Residents? welfare; Energy efficiency; Carbon emissions; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY DEMAND; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; PASSENGER TRANSPORT; US HOUSEHOLDS; TAXATION; IMPACTS; EMISSIONS; REFORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113103
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Imposing a tax on carbon emissions has a mitigating impact on the carbon rebound effect. However, such taxes will also cause a decline in people's welfare. This paper studies the impact of carbon taxation on the CO2 rebound effect and the welfare of Chinese urban households using a multi-regional input-output model and an almost ideal demand system model. The results show that a tax rate of US$ 7.75/tCO2 could mitigate the urban residents' CO2 rebound effect by 14%-57%. This tax rate will also lead to an increase between 0.65% and 1.9% in urban households' total expenditure. In certain provinces, including Qinghai, Hainan, and Xinjiang, the residents' CO2 rebound effect is not considerably reduced, but their welfare experiences substantial losses after the implementation of a carbon taxation policy. However, in some provinces, including Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Henan, the residents' CO2 rebound effect could be significantly reduced while the household welfare showed fewer losses when introducing carbon taxation. Based on empirical research results, we propose that the Chinese government should introduce a higher carbon tax rate nationwide and grant subsidies to provinces such as Qinghai to balance carbon emission reduction targets and residents' acceptance of carbon taxation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, WATER WIND ART DEBAT
  • [2] Tax reform and welfare measurement: Do we need demand system estimation?
    Banks, J
    Blundell, R
    Lewbel, A
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 106 (438) : 1227 - 1241
  • [3] A future for carbon taxes
    Baranzini, A
    Goldemberg, J
    Speck, S
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (03) : 395 - 412
  • [4] Achieving low-carbon urban passenger transport in China: Insights from the heterogeneous rebound effect
    Chen, Zhenni
    Du, Huibin
    Li, Jianglong
    Southworth, Frank
    Ma, Shoufeng
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 : 1029 - 1041
  • [5] Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households
    Chitnis, Mona
    Sorrell, Steve
    Druckman, Angela
    Firth, Steven K.
    Jackson, Tim
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 234 - 250
  • [6] Do vehicle efficiency improvements lead to energy savings? The rebound effect in Great Britain
    Craglia, Matteo
    Cullen, Jonathan
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)
  • [7] The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy
    da Silva Freitas, Lucio Flavio
    de Santana Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos
    de Souza, Kenia Barreiro
    Hewings, Geoffrey John Dennis
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 : 37 - 44
  • [8] Deaton A., 1980, EC CONSUMER BEHAV
  • [9] Economic and environmental effects of CO2 taxation: an input-output analysis for Spain
    Demisse Gemechu, Eskinder
    Butnar, Isabela
    Llop, Maria
    Castells, Francesc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (05) : 751 - 768
  • [10] Tax Policy to Reduce Carbon Emissions in a Distorted Economy: Illustrations from a South Africa CGE Model
    Devarajan, Shantayanan
    Go, Delfin S.
    Robinson, Sherman
    Thierfelder, Karen
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2011, 11 (01):