Understanding preferences for tree attributes: the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors

被引:82
作者
Avolio, Meghan L. [1 ]
Pataki, Diane E. [1 ]
Pincetl, Stephanie [2 ]
Gillespie, Thomas W. [3 ]
Jenerette, G. Darrel [4 ]
McCarthy, Heather R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Bot & Plant Sci, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[5] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cities; Climate; Demographic; LosAngeles; CA; Precipitation; Structural equation modeling; Temperature; Urban biodiversity; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; ATTITUDES; VEGETATION; PARKS;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-014-0388-6
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Urban plant biodiversity is influenced by both the physical environment and attitudes and preferences of urban residents for specific plant types. Urban residents are assumed to be disconnected from their immediate environment, and cultural and societal factors have been emphasized over environmental factors in studies of landscaping choices. However, we postulate that local climatic and environmental factors can also affect preferences for plant attributes. Therefore, spatial and temporal patterns in urban tree biodiversity may be driven not only by the direct effect of environmental variables on plant function, but also by the effect of environmental variables on attitudes toward trees and associated choices about which types of trees to plant. Here, we tested the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors on preferences toward tree attributes in five counties in southern California in and surrounding Los Angeles, based on 1,029 household surveys. We found that local environmental factors have as strong an effect on preferences for tree attributes as socio-economic factors. Specifically, people located in hotter climates (average maximum temperature 25.1 A degrees C) were more likely to value shade trees than those located in cooler regions (23.1 A degrees C). Additionally, people located in desert areas were less likely to consider trees to be important in their city compared with people located in naturally forested areas. Overall, our research demonstrates the inherent connections between local environmental factors and perceptions of nature, even in large modern cities. Accounting for these factors can contribute to the growing interest in understanding patterns of urban biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Snapshots of what matters most: Using resident-employed photography to articulate attachment to place
    Beckley, Thomas M.
    Stedman, Richard C.
    Wallace, Sara M.
    Ambard, Marke
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2007, 20 (10) : 913 - 929
  • [2] The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA
    Clarke, Lorraine Weller
    Jenerette, G. Darrel
    Davila, Antonio
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 116 : 48 - 59
  • [3] Dunlap R.E., 1994, The American Sociologist, V25, P5, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02691936
  • [4] DWYER J F, 1991, Journal of Arboriculture, V17, P276
  • [5] Flannigan John, 2005, Arboricultural Journal, V28, P219
  • [6] Thirty Years of Scholarship and Science on Environment-Society Relationships
    Freudenburg, William R.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 21 (04) : 449 - 459
  • [7] Gorman J., 2004, Journal of Arboriculture, V30, P36
  • [8] LANDSCAPES - THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF NATURE AND THE ENVIRONMENT
    GREIDER, T
    GARKOVICH, L
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 59 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [9] Hitchmough J.D., 1997, LANDSCAPE RES, V22, P327
  • [10] Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity
    Hope, D
    Gries, C
    Zhu, WX
    Fagan, WF
    Redman, CL
    Grimm, NB
    Nelson, AL
    Martin, C
    Kinzig, A
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (15) : 8788 - 8792