Using Low-cost Sensors to Quantify the Effects of Air Filtration on Indoor and Personal Exposure Relevant PM2.5 Concentrations in Beijing, China

被引:53
|
作者
Barkjohn, Karoline K. [1 ]
Bergin, Michael H. [1 ]
Norris, Christina [1 ]
Schauer, James J. [2 ]
Zhang, Yinping [3 ]
Black, Maril yn [4 ]
Hu, Min [5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Junfeng [7 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Underwriters Labs Inc, Marietta, GA 30067 USA
[5] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Beijing Innovat Ctr Engn Sci & Adv Technol, Beijing 00871, Peoples R China
[7] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Air filtration; Low-cost sensors; PM2.5; Personal exposure; Plantower; PARTICULATE MATTER SENSORS; FIELD-EVALUATION; HAZE EVENT; POLLUTION; PARTICLES; AMBIENT; QUALITY; PERFORMANCE; HUMIDITY; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2018.11.0394
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Residents of polluted cities frequently use indoor air purifiers in an attempt to improve their health by reducing their exposure to air pollutants, despite the fact that few studies have assessed these devices under relevant field conditions. Low-cost air monitors are increasingly popular for monitoring air pollution exposure; however, they must be calibrated and evaluated in their deployment location first to ensure measurement accuracy and precision. In this study, we developed a 2-step calibration method in which a low-cost monitor is calibrated against a reference analyzer and is then used to calibrate other monitors, shortening the required calibration time and reducing measurement error. The monitors in our experiment measured indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure PM2.5 concentrations during 1 week each of true and sham filtration in 7 homes in Beijing, China On average, filtration reduced the indoor and personal exposure relevant concentrations by 72% (std. err. = 7%) and 28% (std. err. = 5%), respectively. This study indicates that minimizing personal exposure, however, also requires reducing the infiltration of outdoor air in homes or decreasing PM2.5 pollution at the city or country level.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 313
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China
    Liu, Meichen
    Barkjohn, Karoline K.
    Norris, Christina
    Schauer, James J.
    Zhang, Junfeng
    Zhang, Yinping
    Hu, Min
    Bergin, Michael
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2020, 22 (01) : 131 - 143
  • [2] Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season
    He, Jiayang
    Huang, Ching-Hsuan
    Yuan, Nanhsun
    Austin, Elena
    Seto, Edmund
    Novosselov, Igor
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 285
  • [3] Assessment of PM2.5 concentrations, transport, and mitigation in indoor environments using low-cost air quality monitors and a portable air cleaner
    Sankhyan, Sumit
    Witteman, Julia K.
    Coyan, Steven
    Patel, Sameer
    Vance, Marina E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES, 2022, 2 (04): : 647 - 658
  • [4] Evaluations of Low-cost Air Quality Sensors for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) under Indoor and Outdoor Conditions
    Rabuan, Utbah
    Nadzir, Mohd Shahrul Mohd
    Sham, Siti Zahanah Abdullah
    Bahri, Sharifah Batrisyia Izzati Wan Shaiful
    Borah, Jintu
    Majumdar, Shubhankar
    Lei, Thomas M. T.
    Ali, Sawal Hamid Md
    Wahab, Muhammad Ikram A.
    Yunus, Noor Hidayah Mohd
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2023, 35 (08) : 2881 - 2895
  • [5] Temporal and spatial variation of PM2.5 in indoor air monitored by low-cost sensors
    Shen, Huizhong
    Hou, Weiying
    Zhu, Yaqi
    Zheng, Shuxiu
    Ainiwaer, Subinuer
    Shen, Guofeng
    Chen, Yilin
    Cheng, Hefa
    Hu, Jianying
    Wan, Yi
    Tao, Shu
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
  • [6] Reduction of personal PM2.5 exposure via indoor air filtration systems in Detroit: an intervention study
    Maestas, Melissa M.
    Brook, Robert D.
    Ziemba, Rosemary A.
    Li, Fengyao
    Crane, Ryan C.
    Klaver, Zachary M.
    Bard, Robert L.
    Spino, Catherine A.
    Adar, Sara D.
    Morishita, Masako
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (04) : 484 - 490
  • [7] Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site
    Feenstra, Brandon
    Papapostolou, Vasileios
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Zhang, Hang
    Boghossian, Berj Der
    Cocker, David
    Polidori, Andrea
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 216
  • [8] Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: An Assessment of their Suitability for Various Applications
    Jayaratne, Rohan
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Ahn, Kang-Ho
    Asumadu-Sakyi, Akwasi
    Fisher, Gavin
    Gao, Jian
    Mabon, Adrian
    Mazaheri, Mandana
    Mullins, Benjamin
    Nyaku, Mawutorli
    Ristovski, Zoran
    Scorgie, Yvonne
    Phong Thai
    Dunbabin, Matthew
    Morawska, Lidia
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (03) : 520 - 532
  • [9] Influences of ambient air PM2.5 concentration and meteorological condition on the indoor PM2.5 concentrations in a residential apartment in Beijing using a new approach
    Han, Yang
    Qi, Meng
    Chen, Yilin
    Shen, Huizhong
    Liu, Jing
    Huang, Ye
    Chen, Han
    Liu, Wenxin
    Wang, Xilong
    Liu, Junfeng
    Xing, Baoshan
    Tao, Shu
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2015, 205 : 307 - 314
  • [10] Response of low-cost sensors to high PM2.5 concentrations during bushfire and haze events
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Pushpawela, Buddhi
    Jayaratne, Rohan
    Thai, Phong
    Christensen, Bryce
    Zing, Isak
    Lamont, Riki
    Dunbabin, Matthew
    Wang, Hao
    Gao, Jian
    Morawska, Lidia
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (09) : 978 - 990