INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: OPPORTUNITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF DECENTRALIZATION

被引:0
|
作者
Bukharsky, Vladislav V. [1 ,2 ]
Lavrov, Aleksey M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Financial Res Inst, Minist Finance Russian Federat, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
[2] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Dept Financial Management Publ Sect, Fac Social Sci, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
来源
VOPROSY GOSUDARSTVENNOGO I MUNITSIPALNOGO UPRAVLENIYA-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES | 2021年 / 02期
关键词
public administration; intergovernmental relations; fiscal decentralisation; hard" budget constraints; fiscal federalism; fiscal incentives; subnational governments; REGIONAL ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; FEDERALISM; INCENTIVES; RUSSIA; FEDERATIONS; REFORM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In recent decades, one of the most important trends in public administration reforms has been fiscal decentralization. At the heart of this process is the principle of subsidiarity, according to which local governments must fulfill their own set of functions and make their own budget decisions at the expense of local tax revenues. The importance of fiscal decentralization is noted in international documents, such as the Maastricht Treaty and the European Charter of Local Self-Government. This paper provides an overview of research related to existing academic knowledge in the area of fiscal decentralisation and intergovernmental fiscal relations. The main attention is paid to the opportunities and limitations of decentralisation, the existing empirical estimates of its impact, the latest theoretical concepts of intergovernmental relations and the key principles of regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 153
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The model of intergovernmental relations in fiscal decentralization in Mexico
    Hernandez, David E.
    Villa Sanchez, Sughei
    SI SOMOS AMERICANOS-REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS TRANSFRONTERIZOS, 2010, 10 (01) : 103 - 129
  • [2] The global crisis and intergovernmental relations: centralization versus decentralization 10 years on
    de Mello, Luiz
    Jalles, Joao Tovar
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 54 (07) : 942 - 957
  • [3] Is the Teaching of Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations Dead or Alive in U.S. Public Administration?
    Kincaid, John
    Cole, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION, 2016, 22 (04) : 515 - 530
  • [4] Intergovernmental communication under decentralization
    Bo, Shiyu
    Deng, Liuchun
    Sun, Yufeng
    Wang, Boqun
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 184 : 606 - 652
  • [5] Decentralization, intergovernmental relations in federalist countries: a review of the debate in literature
    Grin, Eduardo Jose
    BIBLIO 3W-BARCELONA, 2016, 21
  • [6] Spatial spillover effects of fiscal decentralization on governance and public administration quality
    Su Dinh Thanh
    Canh Phuc Nguyen
    Bui Duy-Tung
    Nguyen Quang Binh
    Dang Thi Bach Van
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (03) : 478 - 496
  • [7] Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross-country analysis
    De Mello, LR
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (02) : 365 - 380
  • [8] THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
    Kubas, Jozef
    Stofkova, Zuzana
    Misik, Jan
    CBU INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 2017: INNOVATIONS IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2017, 5 : 242 - 246
  • [9] Fiscal Decentralization in Ukraine as Important Part of Reforms of Public Administration and Public Finance
    Petrenko, Yuliya
    ERA OF SCIENCE DIPLOMACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMICS, BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND RELATED DISCIPLINES (EDAMBA 2015), 2015, : 667 - 674
  • [10] Intergovernmental relations for public health adaptation to climate change in the federalist states of Canada and Germany
    Austin, Stephanie E.
    Ford, James D.
    Berrang-Ford, Lea
    Biesbroek, Robbert
    Tosun, Jale
    Ross, Nancy A.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 52 : 226 - 237