Systemic risk contribution of financial institutions in South Africa

被引:0
作者
Leukes, Chanelle [1 ]
Mensah, Jones Odei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Wits Business Sch, 2 St Davids Pl, ZA-2193 Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF | 2019年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Systemic Risk; South Africa; CoVaR; Granger causality network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The recent global financial crisis of 2007-2008 highlighted the necessity of measuring systemic risk amongst banks, insurance firms, and other systemically important institutions, as the failure of these organisations could have incalculable consequences on the financial sector and spillover to the real economy. An investigation into systemic risk is limited in emerging markets, including South Africa, thus maintaining financial stability can be challenging for regulators due to inadequate risk measurements being applied as well as insufficient monitoring of the vulnerable role-players within the financial system. This paper employs two systemic risk measures: the Conditional Value-at-Risk measure referred to as CoVaR pioneered by Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011) and Granger causality tests proposed by Billio et al. (2012). CoVaR is used to determine the systemic risk contribution of individual institutions and Granger causality tests depict the interconnectedness within the financial system that leads to risk spillover to other institutions. The study analyses 22 financial firms within the banking, insurance, and financial services sectors for the period 2005-2017. The results suggest that spillovers increase during distressed periods and that banks and insurance firms are the highest contributors to systemic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 218
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Systemic Risk for Financial Institutions in the Major Petroleum-based Economies: The Role of Oil [J].
Khalifa, Ahmed ;
Caporin, Massimiliano ;
Costola, Michele ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (06) :247-274
[42]   Measuring the systemic risk contribution of financial institutes in China based on CoES model [J].
Zhang B. ;
Wang S. ;
Wei Y. ;
Zhao X. .
Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2018, 38 (03) :565-575
[43]   Measures of systemic risk and financial fragility in Korea [J].
Lee, Jong Han ;
Ryu, Jaemin ;
Tsomocos, Dimitrios P. .
ANNALS OF FINANCE, 2013, 9 (04) :757-786
[44]   Systemic Risk in Financial Risk Regulation [J].
Cipra, Tomas ;
Hendrych, Radek .
FINANCE A UVER-CZECH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2017, 67 (01) :15-38
[45]   How does CEO power and overconfidence affect the systemic risk of China's financial institutions? [J].
Chen, Yingying ;
Safi, Adnan ;
Zeb, Yasir .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
[46]   Interconnectedness, systemic risk, and the influencing factors: Some evidence from China's financial institutions [J].
Wu, Shan ;
Tong, Mu ;
Yang, Zhongyi ;
Zhang, Tianyi .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2021, 569
[47]   How real estate bubbles affect the systemic risk of financial institutions in the United Arab Emirates [J].
Maghyereh, Aktham .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
[48]   An analysis of financial inclusion in South Africa [J].
Matsebula, Velenkosini ;
Yu, Derek .
AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2020, 12 (01) :171-202
[49]   Systemic risk, financial contagion and financial fragility [J].
Martinez-Jaramillo, Serafin ;
Perez Perez, Omar ;
Avila Embriz, Fernando ;
Gallo Dey, Fabrizio Lopez .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2010, 34 (11) :2358-2374
[50]   Monitoring Financial Stress in South Africa [J].
Kisten, Theshne .
EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (15) :4380-4397