Can Land Policy Promote Farmers' Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China

被引:7
|
作者
Liang, Fachao [1 ]
Wang, Zehua [1 ]
Lin, Sheng-Hau [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, Quanzhou 362021, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Law Sch, Dept Publ Adm, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
withdrawal from rural homestead (WRH); happiness; subjective well-being (SWB); rural revitalization; sustainable rural development; LIFE SATISFACTION; RESIDENTIAL LAND; HAPPINESS; QUALITY; MODEL; HAPPY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19127414
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urbanization and aging populations are threatening the sustainability of rural development around the world. Improving the happiness of rural residents is closely related not only to rural development but also to the harmony and stability of a country. Sustainable development has become an important strategy for China's rural areas. Although withdrawal from rural homesteads is an important issue in rural land policy, few researchers have examined the determinants of the subjective well-being of farmers following withdrawal. The current paper investigated 315 rural residents under three models of the "withdrawal from homestead" policy in Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, China. The application of the orderly probit model revealed how satisfaction with economic, social, environment, cultural, and policy factors impacted their subjective well-being. The pooled results showed that satisfaction with cultural and policy factors had no significant impact; however, the other aspects significantly promoted their subjective well-being. The empirical model with interaction terms indicated the significant positive impact of economic, environmental, and social factors on subjective well-being under the index replacement model, while only environment and social factors exerted a significant positive impact under the asset replacement and monetary compensation models. Corresponding policy implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linking Prohibited Grazing Policy to Farmers' Subjective Well-Being: A Case Study in Yanchi County, China
    Wang, Weiwei
    Yang, Guojing
    Sun, Yan
    Chen, Yong
    Zhou, Lihua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [2] Can China's New Rural Cooperative Medical System Improve Farmers' Subjective Well-Being?
    Qi, Wenhao
    Liu, Fang
    Zhang, Tian
    Qi, Xiulin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [3] Can Environmental Protection Behavior Enhance Farmers' Subjective Well-Being?
    Qi, Wenhao
    Xu, Wei
    Qi, Xiulin
    Sun, Meng
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2023, 24 (02) : 505 - 528
  • [4] Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China
    Knight, John
    Song, Lina
    Gunatilaka, Ramani
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 20 (04) : 635 - 649
  • [5] Mobile payment and subjective well-being in rural China
    Wu, Yaqian
    Zhao, Chunkai
    Guo, Jianhao
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, : 2215 - 2232
  • [6] Impact of Digital Literacy on Rural Residents' Subjective Well-Being: An Empirical Study in China
    He, Congxian
    Shi, Ruiqing
    Wen, Huwei
    Chu, Jeffrey
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [7] The relationship between smartphone use and subjective well-being in rural China
    Nie, Peng
    Ma, Wanglin
    Sousa-Poza, Alfonso
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 983 - 1009
  • [8] The relationship between smartphone use and subjective well-being in rural China
    Peng Nie
    Wanglin Ma
    Alfonso Sousa-Poza
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2021, 21 : 983 - 1009
  • [9] Does Subjective Well-Being Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviors? Evidence from Rural Residents in China
    Ouyang, Xi
    Qi, Wen'e
    Song, Donghui
    Zhou, Jianjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
  • [10] Linking health states to subjective well-being: an empirical study of 5854 rural residents in China
    Wang, X.
    Jia, X.
    Zhu, M.
    Chen, J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 129 (06) : 655 - 666