The impact of a 4 cm. cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy

被引:32
作者
Igarashi, T [1 ]
Tobe, T
Nakatsu, HO
Suzuki, N
Murakami, S
Hamano, M
Maruoka, M
Nagayama, T
Matsuzaki, O
Ito, H
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Sch Med, Asahi Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Chiba 280, Japan
[2] Chiba Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Kimitsu Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chiba, Japan
关键词
carcinoma; renal cell; neoplasm staging; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66437-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The 1997 TNM classification defines T1 tumors as those smaller than 7 cm. Recently, a cutoff point of 4 cm. has been proposed to create a subclass of T1 tumors. We evaluated the validity of this cutoff point by assessing the pathological findings and prognoses of patients with T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma following radical nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the hospital charts of 333 patients with T1N0M0 tumors, followed as long as 282 months (median 63) after radical nephrectomy. The validity of tumor size cutoff point for predicting survival outcome was tested in relation to other prognostic factors, including patient age, tumor position, nuclear grade, tumor histopathology and degree of microscopic venous invasion. Results: During followup 32 patients (9.6%) had tumor recurrence and 21 (6.3%) died of renal cell carcinoma. A 5 cm. cutoff point maximized the differences in cancer specific survival rates and a 4 cm, cutoff point maximized the differences in disease-free survival rates. Tumor size was directly related to microscopic venous invasion and nuclear grade, which are significant prognostic factors, and a 4 cm. cutoff point enhanced these relationships. Conclusions: Tumor size is an important prognostic factor for patients with T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. A cutoff point of 4 cm. is practical for dividing the T1N0M0 classification into T1a and T1b subclasses.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1106
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] STAGE-I RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 82 CASES
    GELB, AB
    SHIBUYA, RB
    WEISS, LM
    MEDEIROS, LJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 17 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [2] RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
    GOLIMBU, M
    JOSHI, P
    SPERBER, A
    TESSLER, A
    ALASKARI, S
    MORALES, P
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1986, 27 (04) : 291 - 301
  • [3] RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF THE TNM AND ROBSON STAGE GROUPINGS
    GUINAN, P
    SAFFRIN, R
    STUHLDREHER, D
    FRANK, W
    RUBENSTEIN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 59 (03) : 186 - 189
  • [4] Guinan P, 1997, CANCER, V80, P992, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970901)80:5<992::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-Q
  • [6] RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - TUMOR SIZE, STAGE AND SURVIVAL
    GUINAN, PD
    VOGELZANG, NJ
    FREMGEN, AM
    CHMIEL, JS
    SYLVESTER, JL
    SENER, SF
    IMPERATO, JP
    BARRERA, E
    BERK, R
    FLANIGAN, R
    FURNER, S
    HAND, R
    MONTAG, A
    NORMAN, R
    RECANT, W
    REIMERS, L
    ROSSOF, A
    SMORON, G
    STOLL, R
    TALAMONTI, M
    TERZIAN, C
    WOOD, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) : 901 - 903
  • [7] Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: Impact of tumorsize on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging
    Hafez, KS
    Fergany, AF
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (06) : 1930 - 1933
  • [8] Harmer MH, 1978, TNM CLASSIFICATION M
  • [9] *JAP UR ASS JAP PA, 1992, GEN RUL CLIN PATH ST
  • [10] Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma
    Javidan, J
    Stricker, HJ
    Tamboli, P
    Amin, MB
    Peabody, JO
    Deshpande, A
    Menon, M
    Amin, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (04) : 1277 - 1281