Breast cancer screening in women: An integrative literature review

被引:18
作者
Ravert, Patricia K. [1 ]
Huffaker, Crystal [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Coll Nursing, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Art City Family Med Ctr, Springville, UT USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS | 2010年 / 22卷 / 12期
关键词
Breast health; routine screening; women's health; cancer; mammography; ultrasound; magnetic resonance imaging; HIGH-RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; ULTRASOUND; POPULATION; SURVEILLANCE; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; CARRIERS; US;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00564.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To (a) conduct a thorough search of the literature for breast cancer screening studies utilizing mammography, ultrasound, or breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) critically appraise these studies to aid the nurse practitioner in choosing the most appropriate screening tool for their individual patients. Data sources: Articles were identified from the following databases: CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, EBSCO, ISI, and Cochrane Library. Reference lists from all articles were reviewed and an authority in breast cancer screening was contacted regarding the reference list. Conclusions: Breast MRI had a higher sensitivity than mammography and ultrasound in all studies comparing breast MRI. The specificity was lower for breast MRI than for mammography in five out of six studies. The ultrasound had a higher sensitivity than mammography in all five studies examining women with dense breast tissue. Implications for practice: Women who fall into high-risk categories should be screened yearly with breast MRI and mammography. Women with dense breast tissue according to a standardized density score should be screened yearly with ultrasound and mammography. Women in the general population should be screened yearly with mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 673
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES Q, 2002, US PREV SERV TASK FO
[2]   Epidemiology of breast cancer in older women - Implications for future healthcare [J].
Alberg, AJ ;
Singh, S .
DRUGS & AGING, 2001, 18 (10) :761-772
[3]  
*AM ACAD FAM PHYS, 2009, REC CLIN PREV SERV
[4]  
*AM C OBST GYN, 2004, DET TREAT BREAST PRO
[5]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2009, GUID EARL DET CANC
[6]  
*AM MED ASS, AMA POL BREAST CANC
[7]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[8]   Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts [J].
Crystal, P ;
Strano, SD ;
Shcharynski, S ;
Koretz, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (01) :177-182
[9]   Breast cancer risk elements and nurse practitioners, knowledge, use, and perceived comfort level of breast cancer risk assessment [J].
Edwards, Quannetta T. ;
Maradiegue, Ann ;
Seibert, Diane ;
Saunders-Goldson, Sherri ;
Humphreys, Susanne .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2009, 21 (05) :270-277
[10]   Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue [J].
Kaplan, SS .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) :641-649