Current status of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer

被引:5
作者
Bruch, HP [1 ]
Schwandner, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Lubeck, Chirurg Klin, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
来源
ONKOLOGIE | 2001年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
laparoscopic surgery; colorectal cancer; oncologic resection; port-site metastases;
D O I
10.1159/000050278
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Laparoscopic colorectal procedures offer several benefits postoperatively, including reduction of pain, minimal impairment of pulmonary and gastrointestinal function, and improved reconvalescence. At present, laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer are discussed controversially due to oncologic radicality, potential tumor dissemination, and the fundamental problem of port-site metastases. Oncologic standards of open surgery for colorectal cancer are not compromised by the laparoscopic technique. Short-term results of both retrospective and prospective trials comparing open with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer showed comparable oncologic outcomes related to recurrence and survival. Despite extensive research efforts, neither the incidence of port-site recurrence nor its causes have been clarified definitely. However, according to the preliminary results of recently published studies, the problem of port-site metastases may not be an inherited detriment of laparoscopic surgery, but rather an unfortunate sequel to the learning curve of the application of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Finally, as long-term results of prospective randomized trials are still missing, the crucial issue wh ether laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer is oncologically equivalent to open surgery, cannot be answered definitely. Therefore, in the interim, laparoscopic curative resections in colorectal cancer are only to be offered within prospective randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 32
页数:4
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [31] KOCKERLING F, 1993, LANGENBECKS ARCH C S, P111
  • [32] Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy - A randomized trial
    Lacy, AM
    Delgado, S
    Garcia-Valdecasas, JC
    Castells, A
    Pique, JM
    Grande, L
    Fuster, J
    Targarona, EM
    Pera, M
    Visa, J
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (08): : 1039 - 1042
  • [33] Laury J, 1994, BR J SURG S, V81, P31
  • [34] Traumatic handling of the tumor independent of pneumoperitoneum increases port site implantation rate of colon cancer in a murine model
    Lee, SW
    Southall, J
    Allendorf, J
    Bessler, M
    Whelan, RL
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (06): : 828 - 834
  • [35] Lord SA, 1996, DIS COLON RECTUM, V39, P148
  • [36] A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery:: A preliminary report
    Milsom, JW
    Böhm, B
    Hammerhofer, KA
    Fazio, V
    Steiger, E
    Elson, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 187 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [37] LAPAROSCOPIC COLONIC SURGERY
    MONSON, JRT
    HILL, ADK
    DARZI, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (02) : 150 - 157
  • [38] MULLER JM, 1999, DTSCH ARZTEBL, V96, pA1779
  • [39] Tumor implantation following laparoscopy using different insufflation gases
    Neuhaus, SJ
    Ellis, T
    Rofe, AM
    Pike, GK
    Jamieson, GG
    Watson, DI
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (11): : 1300 - 1302
  • [40] Neuhaus SJ, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P735