Non-cognitive civic outcomes: How can education contribute? European evidence from the ICCS 2016 study

被引:20
作者
Blasko, Zsuzsa [1 ]
da Costa, Patricia Dinis [1 ]
Vera-Toscano, Esperanza [2 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Va, Italy
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Inst Appl Econ & Social Res, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
Active citizenship; Democracy; Europe; Democratic attitudes; ICCS; Civic and citizenship education; Civic knowledge; Self-efficacy; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; KNOWLEDGE; ADOLESCENTS; COMPETENCE; DIVERSITY; COMPOSITE; EFFICACY; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijer.2019.07.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article explores the diverse associations between different educational approaches in civic and citizenship education and a number of civic attitudes and behaviours, including citizenship, expected participation and attitudes towards equal rights, among teenage students in 13 European countries. The results obtained using the 2016 International Civic and Citizenship Survey (ICCS) show that all three educational approaches identified (formal civic learning, school democracy and active community involvement) are related to what students think and how they feel about civic and citizenship issues, although the role of each approach varies considerably across the different civic attitudes and behaviours. Furthermore, students' civic and citizenship knowledge shows somewhat controversial associations with the various attitudes and behaviours discussed here, while civic self-efficacy is consistently positively related to them.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 378
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Is there a relationship between openness in classroom discussion and students' knowledge in civic and citizenship education? [J].
Alivernini, Fabio ;
Manganelli, Sara .
3RD WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES - 2011, 2011, 15 :3441-3445
[2]  
Andr S., 2014, Finnish Journal of Social Research, V7, P7, DOI [https://doi.org/10.51815/fjsr.110720, DOI 10.51815/FJSR.110720]
[3]  
[Anonymous], INFLUENCE CIVIC KNOW
[4]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[5]  
Blasko Z., 2018, 28892EN EUR, DOI [10.2760/2578722018, DOI 10.2760/2578722018]
[6]  
CARO D, 2012, CITIZENSHIP SOCIAL E, V0011
[7]   To Know Democracy Os to Love It: A Cross-National Analysis of Democratic Understanding and Political Support for Democracy [J].
Cho, Youngho .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2014, 67 (03) :478-488
[8]   The Political Socialization of Adolescents in Canada: Differential Effects of Civic Education on Visible Minorities [J].
Claes, Ellen ;
Hooghe, Marc ;
Stolle, Dietlind .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2009, 42 (03) :613-636
[9]   Predictors of intentions to participate in politics and actual political behaviors in young adulthood [J].
Eckstein, Katharina ;
Noack, Peter ;
Gniewosz, Burkhard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 37 (05) :428-435
[10]   Consensus and contested citizenship education goals in Western Europe [J].
Eidhof, Bram B. F. ;
ten Dam, Geert T. M. ;
Dijkstra, Anne Bert ;
van de Werfhorst, Herman G. .
EDUCATION CITIZENSHIP AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2016, 11 (02) :114-129