共 4 条
Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs
被引:162
|作者:
Zhang, X.
[1
]
Perez-Rodriguez, P.
[2
]
Semagn, K.
[3
]
Beyene, Y.
[3
]
Babu, R.
[4
]
Lopez-Cruz, M. A.
[1
]
Vicente, F. San
[1
]
Olsen, M.
[1
]
Buckler, E.
[5
]
Jannink, J-L
[5
]
Prasanna, B. M.
[3
]
Crossa, J.
[1
]
机构:
[1] CIMMYT, Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[2] Colegio Postgrad, Montecillo, Estado De Mexic, Mexico
[3] CIMMYT, Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] CIMMYT India, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[5] Cornell Univ, USDA ARS, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
来源:
关键词:
QUANTITATIVE TRAITS;
BREEDING POPULATIONS;
GENETIC VALUES;
SELECTION;
ACCURACY;
PEDIGREE;
GENOTYPE;
D O I:
10.1038/hdy.2014.99
中图分类号:
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号:
071012 ;
0713 ;
摘要:
One of the most important applications of genomic selection in maize breeding is to predict and identify the best untested lines from biparental populations, when the training and validation sets are derived from the same cross. Nineteen tropical maize biparental populations evaluated in multienvironment trials were used in this study to assess prediction accuracy of different quantitative traits using low-density (similar to 200 markers) and genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively. An extension of the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor that incorporates genotype x environment (GE) interaction was used to predict genotypic values; cross-validation methods were applied to quantify prediction accuracy. Our results showed that: (1) low-density SNPs (similar to 200 markers) were largely sufficient to get good prediction in biparental maize populations for simple traits with moderate-to-high heritability, but GBS outperformed low-density SNPs for complex traits and simple traits evaluated under stress conditions with low-to-moderate heritability; (2) heritability and genetic architecture of target traits affected prediction performance, prediction accuracy of complex traits (grain yield) were consistently lower than those of simple traits (anthesis date and plant height) and prediction accuracy under stress conditions was consistently lower and more variable than under well-watered conditions for all the target traits because of their poor heritability under stress conditions; and (3) the prediction accuracy of GE models was found to be superior to that of non-GE models for complex traits and marginal for simple traits.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文