Evaluation of promoter hypermethylation detection in serum as a diagnostic tool for breast carcinoma in Korean women

被引:28
作者
Kim, Jo-Heon [1 ]
Shin, Min-Ho [2 ,3 ]
Kweon, Sun-Seog [4 ]
Park, Min Ho [3 ,5 ]
Yoon, Jung Han [3 ,5 ]
Lee, Ji Shin [3 ,6 ]
Choi, Chan [3 ,6 ]
Fackler, Mary Jo [7 ]
Sukumar, Saraswati [7 ]
机构
[1] Jeju Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Jejusi, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Kwangju, South Korea
[3] Res Inst Med Sci, Kwangju, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Hwasun Hosp, Jeonnam Reg Canc Ctr, Jeollanamdo, South Korea
[5] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Kwangju, South Korea
[6] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Kwangju, South Korea
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Breast Canc Program, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Breast; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Methylation; Quantitation; Serum; Diagnosis; TUMOR DNA; METHYLATION; GENE; P16(INK4A);
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. We have noted that quantitative multiplex-methylation specific PCR (QM-MSP) analysis of a key panel of genes may be useful as an ancillary tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detection in breast tissue. In this study, we investigated aberrant promoter hypermethylation of four genes as a means to detect epigenetic alterations specific to breast carcinoma in the serum of patients with DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods. Two hundred forty-three serum samples from 89 patients with IDC, 30 patients with DCIS, and 125 age-matched healthy controls were examined. After DNA extraction and sodium bisulfite treatment, QM-MSP was performed for HIN-1, RASSF1A, RAR-beta?,, and Twist. Results. Overall significant differences in rnethylation levels were observed for HIN-1 (p = 0.006), RAR-beta (p<0.001), RASSF1A (p = 0.004), and Twist (p<0.001). All four genes showed significantly higher methylation frequencies in DCIS or IDC than in control subjects (p<0.001 for all comparisons). However, methylation frequencies were not significantly different between DCIS and IDC. In receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the two-gene combination (RAR-beta/RASSF1A) showed the best performance in distinguishing DCIS/IDC from control samples. The estimated specificity of this two-gene panel for detecting DCIS/IDC was 88.8%, and its sensitivity was 94.1%. Conclusions. The quantitative detection of aberrant DNA methylation in serum samples may be a promising high throughput approach for the diagnosis of breast cancer including DCIS. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 181
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
a Tavassoli F., 2003, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs, P63
[2]   LIMITATIONS OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN CHINESE FEMALES [J].
ALAGARATNAM, TT ;
WONG, J .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1985, 36 (02) :175-177
[3]   Detection of circulating tumour DNA in the blood (plasma/serum) of cancer patients [J].
Anker, P ;
Mulcahy, H ;
Chen, XQ ;
Stroun, M .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1999, 18 (01) :65-73
[4]   DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer [J].
Baylin S.B. .
Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2005, 2 (Suppl 1) :S4-S11
[5]  
Brooks JD, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P531
[6]   Evaluation of promoter hypermethylation detection in body fluids as a Screening/Diagnosis tool for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Carvalho, Andre Lopes ;
Jeronimo, Carmen ;
Kim, Michael M. ;
Henrique, Rui ;
Zhang, Zhe ;
Hoque, Mohammad O. ;
Chang, Steve ;
Brait, Mariana ;
Nayak, Chetan S. ;
Jiang, Wei-Wen ;
Claybourne, Quia ;
Tokumaru, Yutaka ;
Lee, Juna ;
Goldenberg, David ;
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth ;
Goodman, Steven ;
Moon, Chul-so ;
Koch, Wayne ;
Westra, William H. ;
Sidransky, David ;
Califano, Joseph A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (01) :97-107
[7]   Sensitive detection of DNA methylation [J].
Cottrell, SE ;
Laird, PW .
EPIGENETICS IN CANCER PREVENTION: EARLY DETECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2003, 983 :120-130
[8]   Methylated genes as new cancer biomarkers [J].
Duffy, M. J. ;
Napieralski, R. ;
Martens, J. W. M. ;
Span, P. N. ;
Spyratos, F. ;
Sweep, F. C. G. J. ;
Brunner, N. ;
Foekens, J. A. ;
Schmitt, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (03) :335-346
[9]   Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations [J].
Elmore, G ;
Barton, MB ;
Moceri, VM ;
Polk, S ;
Arena, PJ ;
Fletcher, SW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (16) :1089-1096
[10]  
Ernster VL, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1546