Sexual orientation and self-reported lying

被引:10
作者
Berg, Nathan [1 ]
Lien, Donald [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Econ Polit & Policy Sci, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Econ, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
关键词
Deception; Sexual orientation; Gay; Misreporting; Non-response; EARNINGS; INCOME;
D O I
10.1007/s11150-008-9038-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines empirical links between sexual orientation and self-reported lying using data collected in several waves of Georgia Institute of Technology's World Wide Web Users Survey. The data include questions about sexual orientation, lying in cyberspace, and a broad range of demographic information. According to the theoretical framework of Gneezy (Am Econ Rev 95: 384-395, 2005) on the economics of deception, individuals conceal or falsify information when the expected benefit of lying exceeds its costs in terms of psychic disutility. If non-heterosexuals expect to benefit more by falsifying information, then this theory predicts higher rates of lying among non-heterosexuals. The data show that gays and lesbians do indeed report lying more often than heterosexuals, both unconditionally in bivariate correlations and after controlling for demographic and geographic differences. These empirical results are consistent with the conclusion that non-heterosexuals expect higher benefits from concealing personal information because of anti-homosexual discrimination.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 104
页数:22
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[2]   An empirical analysis of homosexual/heterosexual male earnings differentials: Unmarried and unequal? [J].
Allegretto, SA ;
Arthur, MM .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2001, 54 (03) :631-646
[3]   Wedding bell blues: The income tax consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage [J].
Alm, J ;
Badgett, MVL ;
Whittington, LA .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2000, 53 (02) :201-214
[4]  
[Anonymous], MONEY MYTHS CHANGE E
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
[6]   THE WAGE EFFECTS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION [J].
BADGETT, MVL .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1995, 48 (04) :726-739
[7]   Measuring the effect of sexual orientation on income: Evidence of discrimination? [J].
Berg, N ;
Lien, D .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2002, 20 (04) :394-414
[8]  
Berg N., 2005, Encyclopedia of social measurement, V2, P865, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00038-4
[9]   Same-sex sexual behaviour: US frequency estimates from survey data with simultaneous misreporting and non-response [J].
Berg, Nathan ;
Lien, Donald .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2006, 38 (07) :757-769
[10]   Why do gay men live in San Francisco? [J].
Black, D ;
Gates, G ;
Sanders, S ;
Taylor, L .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2002, 51 (01) :54-76