The Potential Value of Preoperative MRI Texture and Shape Analysis in Grading Meningiomas: A Preliminary Investigation

被引:88
作者
Yan, Peng-Fei [1 ]
Yan, Ling [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Ting-Ting [1 ]
Xiao, Dong-Dong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhen [4 ]
Zhao, Hong-Yang [1 ]
Feng, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Neurosurg, 1277 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Northern BC, Dept Comp Sci, Prince George, BC, Canada
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
QUANTITATIVE CT TEXTURE; DIFFERENTIATE BENIGN; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; SEGMENTATION; FEATURES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
OBJECT: Preoperative knowledge of meningioma grade is essential for planning treatment and surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of MRI texture and shape analysis in grading meningiomas. METHODS: A surgical database was reviewed to identify meningioma patients who had undergone tumor resection between January 2015 and December 2016. Preoperative MR images were retrieved and analyzed. Texture and shape analysis was conducted to quantitatively evaluate tumor heterogeneity and morphology. Three machine learning classifiers were trained with these features to build classification models. The performance of the features and classification models was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included in this study: 21 with high-grade meningiomas and 110 with low-grade meningiomas. Three texture features were selected: Horzl_RLNonUni, S(2,2) SumOfSqs, and WavEnHL_s-3; three shape features were selected: GeoFv, GeoW4, and GeoW5b. The Mann-Whitney test indicated that all six features were significantly different between high-grade and low-grade meningiomas. AUC values were generally greater than 0.50 (range, 0.73 to 0.88). Sensitivities and specificities ranged from 47.62% to 90.48% and 69.09% to 96.36%, respectively. Among the nine classification models obtained, the one built by training the SVM classifier with all six features achieved the best performance, with a sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and AUC of 0.86, 0.87, 0.87, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Texture and shape analysis, especially when combined with a SVM classifier, can provide satisfactory performance in the preoperative determination of meningioma grade and is thus potentially useful for clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 577
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Quantitative CT texture and shape analysis: Can it differentiate benign and malignant mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with primary lung cancer? [J].
Bayanati, Hamid ;
Thornhill, Rebecca E. ;
Souza, Carolina A. ;
Sethi-Virmani, Vineeta ;
Gupta, Ashish ;
Maziak, Donna ;
Amjadi, Kayvan ;
Dennie, Carole .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (02) :480-487
[2]   Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic [J].
Bedard, Philippe L. ;
Hansen, Aaron R. ;
Ratain, Mark J. ;
Siu, Lillian L. .
NATURE, 2013, 501 (7467) :355-364
[3]   Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification [J].
Collewet, G ;
Strzelecki, M ;
Mariette, F .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (01) :81-91
[4]   Fractal Analysis May Improve the Preoperative Identification of Atypical Meningiomas [J].
Czyz, Marcin ;
Radwan, Hesham ;
Li, Jian Y. ;
Filippi, Christopher G. ;
Tykocki, Tomasz ;
Schulder, Michael .
NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (02) :300-308
[5]   CT FINDINGS IN MALIGNANT MENINGIOMAS [J].
DIETEMANN, JL ;
HELDT, N ;
BURGUET, JL ;
MEDJEK, L ;
MAITROT, D ;
WACKENHEIM, A .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1982, 23 (04) :207-209
[6]   Predictive modeling in glioma grading from MR perfusion images using support vector machines [J].
Emblem, Kyrre E. ;
Zoellner, Frank G. ;
Tennoe, Bjorn ;
Nedregaard, Baard ;
Nome, Terje ;
Due-Tonnessen, Paulina ;
Hald, John K. ;
Scheie, David ;
Bjornerud, Atle .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (04) :945-952
[7]   An introduction to ROC analysis [J].
Fawcett, Tom .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (08) :861-874
[8]  
Guyon I, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P1157, DOI DOI 10.1162/153244303322753616
[9]  
Hall M., 2009, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS, V11, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278, 10.1145/1656274.1656278]
[10]   STATISTICAL AND STRUCTURAL APPROACHES TO TEXTURE [J].
HARALICK, RM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1979, 67 (05) :786-804