Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy

被引:74
|
作者
Pepe, Pietro [1 ]
Garufi, Antonio
Priolo, Gian Domenico [3 ]
Galia, Antonio
Fraggetta, Filippo [2 ]
Pennisi, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Cannizzaro Hosp, Urol, Catania, Italy
[2] Cannizzaro Hosp, Pathol, Catania, Italy
[3] Cannizzaro Hosp, Dept Imaging, Catania, Italy
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; diagnosis; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER DETECTION; FUSION BIOPSY; MRI; COST; CLASSIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; DIAGNOSIS; PROMIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer and compared it with the diagnostic accuracy of transperineal saturation prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to February 2018 repeat saturation prostate biopsy (the reference test) was done due to suspicion of cancer in 1,032 men with a median age of 63 years in whom median prostate specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. All patients underwent 3.0 Tesla pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before saturation prostate biopsy. Additional targeted fusion prostate biopsy was done of lesions with a PI-RADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score of 3 or greater. Results: T1c prostate cancer was found in 372 of the 1,032 patients (36%). Of these cases 272 (73.1%) were classified as clinically significant prostate cancer. Saturation prostate biopsy vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater diagnosed 95.6% vs 83.8% vs 60.3% of clinically significant prostate cancers (p < 0.0001). Saturation prostate biopsy missed 12 of 272 clinically significant prostate cancers (4.5%) vs 44 (16.2%) and 108 of 272 (39.7%) missed by targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and a score of 4 or greater, respectively (p < 0.0001). As a triage test multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have spared 49.3% vs 73.6% of patients using a PI-RADS cutoff of 3 or greater vs 4 or greater. Conclusions: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies in about 50% of cases in which a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater is used. At the same time patients should be informed of the 16.2% and 39.7% false-negative rates of clinically significant prostate cancer for targeted fusion prostate biopsy of PI-RADS 3 or greater and 4 or greater lesions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 778
页数:5
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy using three-dimensional ultrasound-based organ-tracking technology: Initial experience in Japan
    Yamada, Yasuhiro
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Ueda, Takashi
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Ueno, Akihisa
    Inoue, Yuta
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Hongo, Fumiya
    Okihara, Koji
    Ukimura, Osamu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : 544 - 549
  • [42] The Feasibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Targeted Biopsy Using Novel Navigation Systems to Detect Early Stage Prostate Cancer: The Preliminary Experience
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Verma, Sadhna
    Kalyanaraman, Balaji
    Zhai, Qihui J.
    Gaitonde, Krishnanath
    Pugnale, Michael
    Donovan, James F.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (07) : 820 - 825
  • [43] Editorial Comment from Dr Ukimura to Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 146 - 147
  • [44] Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Singh, Anurag K.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Xu, Sheng
    Glossop, Neil
    Guion, Peter
    Ullman, Karen
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) : 841 - 845
  • [45] Diagnostic Pathway Outcomes for Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Lesions Using Cognitive Registration and Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Men (CRAFT Single-Center Study)
    Fleville, Samara
    O'Neill, Carole
    Safar, Daniel
    Macleod, Alex
    Mulholland, Colin
    Subin, Filip
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (06) : 821 - 831
  • [46] Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen
    Huibo Lian
    Junlong Zhuang
    Wei Wang
    Bing Zhang
    Jiong Shi
    Danyan Li
    Yao Fu
    Xuping Jiang
    Weimin Zhou
    Hongqian Guo
    BMC Urology, 17
  • [47] Fourteen-Core Systematic Biopsy That Includes Two Anterior Cores in Men With PI-RADS Lesion > 3 is Comparable With Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Single-institution Experience
    Sterling, Joshua
    Smith, Kelsea
    Farber, Nicholas
    Nagaya, Naoya
    Jang, Thomas L.
    Singer, Eric A.
    Sadimin, Evita
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2021, 19 (04) : 275 - 279
  • [48] Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naive men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml-1 to 10 ng ml-1
    Zhang, Chi-Chen
    Tu, Xiang
    Lin, Tian-Hai
    Cai, Di-Ming
    Yang, Ling
    Qiu, Shi
    Liu, Zhen-Hua
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2023, 25 (04) : 492 - +