Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy

被引:74
|
作者
Pepe, Pietro [1 ]
Garufi, Antonio
Priolo, Gian Domenico [3 ]
Galia, Antonio
Fraggetta, Filippo [2 ]
Pennisi, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Cannizzaro Hosp, Urol, Catania, Italy
[2] Cannizzaro Hosp, Pathol, Catania, Italy
[3] Cannizzaro Hosp, Dept Imaging, Catania, Italy
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; diagnosis; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER DETECTION; FUSION BIOPSY; MRI; COST; CLASSIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; DIAGNOSIS; PROMIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer and compared it with the diagnostic accuracy of transperineal saturation prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to February 2018 repeat saturation prostate biopsy (the reference test) was done due to suspicion of cancer in 1,032 men with a median age of 63 years in whom median prostate specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. All patients underwent 3.0 Tesla pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before saturation prostate biopsy. Additional targeted fusion prostate biopsy was done of lesions with a PI-RADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score of 3 or greater. Results: T1c prostate cancer was found in 372 of the 1,032 patients (36%). Of these cases 272 (73.1%) were classified as clinically significant prostate cancer. Saturation prostate biopsy vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater diagnosed 95.6% vs 83.8% vs 60.3% of clinically significant prostate cancers (p < 0.0001). Saturation prostate biopsy missed 12 of 272 clinically significant prostate cancers (4.5%) vs 44 (16.2%) and 108 of 272 (39.7%) missed by targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and a score of 4 or greater, respectively (p < 0.0001). As a triage test multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have spared 49.3% vs 73.6% of patients using a PI-RADS cutoff of 3 or greater vs 4 or greater. Conclusions: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies in about 50% of cases in which a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater is used. At the same time patients should be informed of the 16.2% and 39.7% false-negative rates of clinically significant prostate cancer for targeted fusion prostate biopsy of PI-RADS 3 or greater and 4 or greater lesions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 778
页数:5
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
    Song, Gang
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Wang, He
    Fan, Yu
    He, Qun
    Lin, Zhiyong
    Li, Xueying
    Li, Peng
    Wang, Xiaoying
    He, Zhisong
    Zhou, Liqun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (06) : 1202 - 1208
  • [22] Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Giganti, Francesco
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (06) : 946 - 958
  • [23] Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?
    Castellani, Daniele
    Pace, Gianna
    Cecchini, Sara
    Franzese, Carmine
    Cicconofri, Andrea
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Possanzini, Marco
    Paci, Enrico
    Dellabella, Marco
    Pierangeli, Tiziana
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 452.e9 - 452.e16
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Fujii, Shinsuke
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Honda, Yukiko
    Terada, Hiroaki
    Akita, Ryuji
    Kitamura, Naoyuki
    Ueda, Eikoh
    Han, Xiangrui
    Ueno, Takeshi
    Miyamoto, Shunsuke
    Kitano, Hiroyuki
    Inoue, Shogo
    Teishima, Jun
    Abdi, Hamidreza
    Awai, Kazuo
    Takeshima, Yukio
    Sentani, Kazuhiro
    Yasui, Wataru
    Matsubara, Akio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [25] Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men
    Shoji, Sunao
    Hiraiwa, Shinichiro
    Ogawa, Takahiro
    Kawakami, Masayoshi
    Nakano, Mayura
    Hashida, Kazunobu
    Sato, Yoshinobu
    Hasebe, Terumitsu
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    Tajiri, Takuma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 288 - 294
  • [26] Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
    Klotz, Laurence
    Chin, Joseph
    Black, Peter C.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bladou, Franck
    Machado, Ashley
    Levental, Mark
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Chang, Sylvia
    Milot, Laurent
    Patel, Chirag
    Kassam, Zahra
    Moore, Carolyn
    Kasivisanathan, Veeru
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Kebabdjian, Marlene
    Earle, Craig C.
    Pond, Greg R.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (04) : 534 - 542
  • [27] Detection of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography image-fusion targeted biopsy in African-American men
    Shin, Toshitaka
    Smyth, Thomas B.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Ahmadi, Nariman
    Abreu, Andre Luis de Castro
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Mimata, Hiromitsu
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (02) : 233 - 238
  • [28] Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Hirahara, Naoki
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    Kamoi, Kazumi
    Okihara, Koji
    Ito, Hirotoshi
    Nishimura, Tsunehiko
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) : 890 - 893
  • [29] The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Llukani, Elton
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    UROLOGY, 2017, 102 : 178 - 182
  • [30] Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen
    Lian, Huibo
    Zhuang, Junlong
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Bing
    Shi, Jiong
    Li, Danyan
    Fu, Yao
    Jiang, Xuping
    Zhou, Weimin
    Guo, Hongqian
    BMC UROLOGY, 2017, 17