Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy

被引:74
|
作者
Pepe, Pietro [1 ]
Garufi, Antonio
Priolo, Gian Domenico [3 ]
Galia, Antonio
Fraggetta, Filippo [2 ]
Pennisi, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Cannizzaro Hosp, Urol, Catania, Italy
[2] Cannizzaro Hosp, Pathol, Catania, Italy
[3] Cannizzaro Hosp, Dept Imaging, Catania, Italy
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; diagnosis; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER DETECTION; FUSION BIOPSY; MRI; COST; CLASSIFICATION; ULTRASOUND; DIAGNOSIS; PROMIS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer and compared it with the diagnostic accuracy of transperineal saturation prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to February 2018 repeat saturation prostate biopsy (the reference test) was done due to suspicion of cancer in 1,032 men with a median age of 63 years in whom median prostate specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. All patients underwent 3.0 Tesla pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before saturation prostate biopsy. Additional targeted fusion prostate biopsy was done of lesions with a PI-RADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score of 3 or greater. Results: T1c prostate cancer was found in 372 of the 1,032 patients (36%). Of these cases 272 (73.1%) were classified as clinically significant prostate cancer. Saturation prostate biopsy vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater diagnosed 95.6% vs 83.8% vs 60.3% of clinically significant prostate cancers (p < 0.0001). Saturation prostate biopsy missed 12 of 272 clinically significant prostate cancers (4.5%) vs 44 (16.2%) and 108 of 272 (39.7%) missed by targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and a score of 4 or greater, respectively (p < 0.0001). As a triage test multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have spared 49.3% vs 73.6% of patients using a PI-RADS cutoff of 3 or greater vs 4 or greater. Conclusions: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies in about 50% of cases in which a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater is used. At the same time patients should be informed of the 16.2% and 39.7% false-negative rates of clinically significant prostate cancer for targeted fusion prostate biopsy of PI-RADS 3 or greater and 4 or greater lesions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 778
页数:5
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Optimal Number of Systematic Biopsy Cores Used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Teraoka, Shogo
    Honda, Masashi
    Shimizu, Ryutaro
    Nishikawa, Ryoma
    Kimura, Yusuke
    Yumioka, Tetsuya
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    YONAGO ACTA MEDICA, 2021, 64 (03) : 260 - 268
  • [2] Optimising the number of cores for magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted and systematic transperineal prostate biopsy
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Lloyd, Thomas
    Warren, Anne
    Samel, Christina
    Bratt, Ola
    Kastner, Christof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (02) : 260 - 269
  • [3] Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Koehne, Elizabeth L.
    Shea, Steven M.
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Goldberg, Ari
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (01) : 108 - 116
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification
    Mendhiratta, Neil
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Wysock, James S.
    Fenstermaker, Michael
    Huang, Richard
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Zhou, Ming
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (06) : 1601 - 1606
  • [5] Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy
    Kenigsberg, Alexander P.
    Renson, Audrey
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Huang, Richard
    Wysock, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (05): : 418 - 425
  • [6] Who Can Avoid Systematic Biopsy Without Missing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Who Undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy?
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Ito, Masaya
    Fukushima, Iirushi
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Kataoka, Madoka
    Ikuta, Shuzo
    Sakamoto, Kazumasa
    Takemura, Kosuke
    Suzuki, Hiroaki
    Tobisu, Ken-ichi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (03) : E664 - E671
  • [7] TARGETED BIOPSY WITH REDUCED NUMBER OF CORES: OPTIMAL SAMPLING SCHEME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING/TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Shen, Wei-Wei
    Cui, Li-Gang
    Ran, Wei-Qiang
    Sun, Yan
    Jiang, Jie
    Pei, Xin-Long
    Chen, Wen
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 1197 - 1207
  • [8] Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: A Meta-Analysis
    Tu, Xiang
    Liu, Zhenhua
    Zhang, Chichen
    Chang, Tiancong
    Xu, He
    Bao, Yige
    Li, Jiakun
    Jin, Kun
    Yuan, Qiming
    Qiu, Shi
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2020, 104 (3-4) : 187 - 198
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Men with Previously Negative Prostate Biopsy Results
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Chung, Mun Su
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Oh, Young Taik
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Chung, Byung Ha
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (07) : 787 - 791
  • [10] Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    Lee, Chung Un
    Song, Wan
    Kang, Minyong
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (03) : 134 - 138