Does the Presence of an Epiretinal Membrane Alter the Cleavage Plane during Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling?

被引:52
|
作者
Kenawy, Nihal [1 ]
Wong, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stappler, Theodore [1 ]
Romano, Mario R. [1 ]
Das, Ronald A. [1 ]
Hebbar, Gillian [1 ]
Prime, Wendy [3 ]
Heimann, Heinrich [1 ]
Gibran, Syed K. [1 ]
Sheridan, Carl M. [3 ]
Cheung, Yin Him [2 ,3 ]
Hiscott, Paul S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, St Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Inst Eye, HBHA Ctr, LKS Fac Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Liverpool, Unit Ophthalmol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[4] Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Liverpool L7 8XP, Merseyside, England
关键词
MACULAR HOLE SURGERY; BRILLIANT-BLUE-G; GANGLION-CELL NEURITES; INDOCYANINE GREEN; PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY; SELECTIVELY STAINS; REMOVAL; ULTRASTRUCTURE; INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether the presence of a clinically and/or microscopically detectable epiretinal membrane (ERM) alters the cleavage plane during internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Design: Retrospective, observational, immunohistochemical study of ILM specimens using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Participants: Fifty-one patients who had had ILM excision. Methods: Fifty-one ILM specimens peeled during vitrectomy for various etiologies were examined by light microscopy. The removal of ILM was assisted using Trypan blue (n = 30), indocyanine green (n = 7), or brilliant blue G (n = 14). Monoclonal antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein and to neurofilament protein were used to detect glial or neuronal cells respectively on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of the ILM. Specimens were divided into 2 groups: ILM peeled for full-thickness macular hole (MH; n = 31) and ILM peeled after removal of clinically detectable ERM (n = 20). Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was the localization of immunohistochemical markers to neuronal or glial cells on the vitreous or retinal surfaces of ILM. The secondary outcome measure was the correlation of the results of the primary measure with the dyes used to facilitate ILM peeling. Results: Glial and/or neuronal cells were detected on the retinal surface of the ILM in 10 of 31 (32%) of the MH ILM specimens and in 13 of 20 (65%) of the ILM peeled after ERM excision; the difference was significant (P = 0.02). There was no association between the presence of neuronal and glial cells with the type of dye used (P = 0.2). Of the 23 ILM specimens with cells attached to the retinal surface, 21 (91%) were associated with clinical and/or histologic evidence of ERM and 2 (9%) were not. The correlation between the presence of cells on the vitreous and the retinal surfaces of ILM was high (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that ERM may be associated with sub-ILM changes that alter the plane of separation during ILM peeling. This study does not confirm any influence of dyes on the cleavage plane during surgery. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 320-323 (C) 2010 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / U152
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING AREA DURING EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY
    Koehrer, Philippe
    Bron, Alain M.
    Dugas, Brice
    Isaico, Rodica
    Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2014, 34 (07): : 1335 - 1340
  • [2] Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
    Zhang, Bowen
    Dong, Xingmei
    Sun, Yi
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (03)
  • [3] Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
    Kwok, AKH
    Lai, TYY
    Yuen, KSC
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 33 (04) : 379 - 385
  • [4] Standard internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane abrasion technique for primary epiretinal membrane surgery
    Bagci, Fatma
    Citirik, Mehmet
    Dulger, Selda Celik
    Teke, Mehmet Yasin
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2024, 87 (01)
  • [5] Anatomical and functional repercussions of internal limiting membrane peeling in epiretinal membrane surgery
    Guigou, S.
    Courjaret, J. -C.
    Marc, C.
    Benhammar, J.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2013, 36 (02): : 151 - 159
  • [6] Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A meta-analysis
    Chang, Wei-Cheng
    Lin, Chin
    Lee, Cho-Hao
    Sung, Tzu-Ling
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Liu, Jorn-Hon
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [7] Effects of internal limiting membrane peeling in epiretinal membrane surgery on OCT-angiography
    Muller, Y. -G.
    Soudier, G.
    Olteanu, S.
    Lenoble, P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (08): : 896 - 907
  • [8] Vitrectomy for the removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without internal limiting membrane peeling: a meta-analysis
    Christodoulou, Eleni
    Batsos, Georgios
    Galanis, Petros
    Kalogeropoulos, Christos
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Alamanos, Yannis
    Stefaniotou, Maria
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [9] Residual internal limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane surgery
    Kifuku, K.
    Hata, Y.
    Kohno, R-i
    Kawahara, S.
    Mochizuki, Y.
    Enaida, H.
    Sonoda, K-h
    Ishibashi, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (08) : 1016 - 1019
  • [10] Outcomes after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
    Guber, Josef
    Pereni, Ioana
    Scholl, Hendrik P. N.
    Guber, Ivo
    Haynes, Richard J.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) : 297 - 303