Sprouting of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Effect on saponin content and relation to the taste and astringency assessed by electronic tongue

被引:24
作者
Suarez-Estrella, Diego [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Borgonovo, Gigliola [1 ]
Buratti, Susanna [1 ]
Ferranti, Pasquale [4 ]
Accardo, Francesca [4 ]
Pagani, Maria Ambrogina [1 ]
Marti, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Food Environm & Nutr Sci DeFENS, Via G Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Azuay, Fac Ciencia & Tecnol, Grp Invest Quimiometria, Av 24 Mayo 7-77 & Hernan Malo, Cuenca, Ecuador
[3] Univ Azuay, Fac Ciencia & Tecnol, QSAR, Av 24 Mayo 7-77 & Hernan Malo, Cuenca, Ecuador
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Agr Sci, Portici, Italy
关键词
Quinoa; Bitterness; Saponins; Germination; PHENOLIC-COMPOUNDS; GERMINATION; FERMENTATION; ATTRIBUTES; BITTERNESS; COMPONENTS; LENTILS; BLACK; SEEDS; L;
D O I
10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111234
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This study aimed at addressing the effect of quinoa sprouting on saponins which are considered the main responsible for quinoa bitterness and astringency, and consequently on quinoa taste. Whole quinoa was sprouted for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h at 22 degrees C and dried at 55 degrees C for 6 h. Quinoa taste was assessed by electronic tongue and mainly related to the amount of saponins that were evaluated by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and mass spectrometry (MS). Sprouting decreased quinoa bitterness and astringency, with the main changes occurring within the 48 h of treatment. Both semi-quantitative (by TLC) and quantitative (by MS) analysis revealed that changes in quinoa taste upon sprouting was mainly related to the decrease in the amount of saponins, reaching the value of 0.086 mg/100 g after 48 h of treatment. Finally, changes in phenolic compounds seem to play a minor role in affecting the taste traits of sprouted quinoa.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant Activity, and Ameliorating Efficacy of Chenopodium quinoa Sprouts against CCl4-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rats
    Al-Qabba, Maryam M.
    El-Mowafy, Maha A.
    Althwab, Sami A.
    Alfheeaid, Hani A.
    Aljutaily, Thamer
    Barakat, Hassan
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (10) : 1 - 15
  • [2] Polyphenol composition and in vitro antioxidant activity of amaranth, quinoa buckwheat and wheat as affected by sprouting and baking
    Alvarez-Jubete, L.
    Wijngaard, H.
    Arendt, E. K.
    Gallagher, E.
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2010, 119 (02) : 770 - 778
  • [3] Effect of malting conditions on phenolic content, Maillard reaction products formation, and antioxidant activity of quinoa seeds
    Ariel Carciochi, Ramiro
    Dimitrov, Krasimir
    DAlessandro, Leandro Galvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2016, 53 (11): : 3978 - 3985
  • [4] Ayet G, 1997, J SCI FOOD AGR, V74, P273, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199706)74:2<273::AID-JSFA800>3.3.CO
  • [5] 2-C
  • [6] Bau HM, 2000, NAHRUNG, V44, P2, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(20000101)44:1<2::AID-FOOD2>3.3.CO
  • [7] 2-0, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(20000101)44:1<2::AID-FOOD2>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-9]
  • [9] Response of some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature:: Effects on germination, phenology, growth and freezing
    Bois, J. E.
    Winkel, T.
    Lhomme, J. P.
    Raffaillac, J. P.
    Rocheteau, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2006, 25 (04) : 299 - 308
  • [10] Effects of processing on the nutraceutical profile of quinoa
    Brady, Kevin
    Ho, Chi-Tang
    Rosen, Robert T.
    Sang, Shengmin
    Karwe, Mukund V.
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2007, 100 (03) : 1209 - 1216