Evaluation of CMIP5 models and ensemble climate projections using a Bayesian approach: a case study of the Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan

被引:17
作者
Khan, Firdos [1 ]
Pilz, Juergen [2 ]
Ali, Shaukat [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Nat Sci SNS, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[2] Alpen Adria Univ, Inst Stat, Univ Str 65-67, A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria
[3] Minist Climate Change, Global Change Impact Studies Ctr GCISC, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
关键词
Bayesian Model Averaging; Ensemble Projections; General Circulation Model; Posterior Inclusion Probability; Upper Indus Basin; BIAS CORRECTION; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATIONS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; SELECTION; IMPACTS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10651-021-00490-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The availability of a variety of Global Climate Models (GCMs) has increased the importance of the selection of suitable GCMs for impact assessment studies. In this study, we have used Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) for GCM(s) selection and ensemble climate projection from the output of thirteen CMIP5 GCMs for the Upper Indus Basin (UIB), Pakistan. The results show that the ranking of the top best models among thirteen GCMs is not uniform regarding maximum, minimum temperature, and precipitation. However, some models showed the best performance for all three variables. The selected GCMs were used to produce ensemble projections via BMA for maximum, minimum temperature and precipitation under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios for the duration of 2011-2040. The ensemble projections show a higher correlation with observed data than individual GCM's output, and the BMA's prediction well captured the trend of observed data. Furthermore, the 90% prediction intervals of BMA's output closely captured the extreme values of observed data. The projected results of both RCPs were compared with the climatology of baseline duration (1981-2010) and it was noted that RCP8.5 show more changes in future temperature and precipitation compared to RCP4.5. For maximum temperature, there is more variation in monthly climatology for the duration of 2011-2040 in the first half of the year; however, under the RCP8.5, higher variation was noted during the winter season. A decrease in precipitation is projected during the months of January and August under the RCP4.5 while under RCP8.5, decrease in precipitation was noted during the months of March, May, July, August, September, and October; however, the changes (decrease/increase) are higher than under the RCP4.5.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 404
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Application of Bayesian framework for evaluation of streamflow simulations using multiple climate models [J].
Achieng, Kevin O. ;
Zhu, Jianting .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 574 :1110-1128
[2]   Multimodel combination techniques for analysis of hydrological simulations: Application to Distributed Model Intercomparison Project results [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Gao, Xiaogang ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (04) :755-768
[3]   Twenty first century climatic and hydrological changes over Upper Indus Basin of Himalayan region of Pakistan [J].
Ali, Shaukat ;
Dan Li ;
Fu Congbin ;
Khan, Firdos .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (01)
[4]  
ANSCOMBE FJ, 1948, BIOMETRIKA, V35, P246, DOI 10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246
[5]   Sources of errors in the simulation of south Asian summer monsoon in the CMIP5 GCMs [J].
Ashfaq, Moetasim ;
Rastogi, Deeksha ;
Mei, Rui ;
Touma, Danielle ;
Leung, L. Ruby .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2017, 49 (1-2) :193-223
[6]   Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit [J].
Baumberger, Christoph ;
Knutti, Reto ;
Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (03)
[7]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[8]   Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling [J].
Blasone, Roberta-Serena ;
Vrugt, Jasper A. ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Rosbjerg, Dan ;
Robinson, Bruce A. ;
Zyvoloski, George A. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2008, 31 (04) :630-648
[9]  
Brekke L., 2013, Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate and Hydrology Projections: Release of Downscaled CMIP5 Climate Projections, Comparison with Preceding Information, and Summary of User Needs
[10]   Reducing Uncertainties in Climate Projections with Emergent Constraints: Concepts, Examples and Prospects [J].
Brient, Florent .
ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (01) :1-15