Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: A systematic review

被引:97
作者
Albada, Akke [1 ]
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. [2 ]
Bensing, Jozien M. [1 ,3 ]
van Dulmen, Sandra [1 ]
机构
[1] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Genet, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Hlth Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Health education; Information; Computer; Neoplasm; Risk; Review; MATCHING HEALTH MESSAGES; LOW-INCOME; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAMMOGRAPHY USE; STEPPED-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; COMPUTER; WOMEN; EDUCATION; SMOKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To study interventions that provide people with information about cancer risk and about screening that is tailored to their personal characteristics. We assess the tailoring characteristics, theory base and effects on risk perception, knowledge and screening behavior of these interventions. Methods: A systematic literature review in this field was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched. Forty studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed and a best evidence synthesis conducted for the 28 randomized controlled trials without co-intervention or with similar co-intervention in intervention and control group. Results: Most included studies evaluated an intervention aiming to promote cancer screening. The majority of articles (30) evaluated information that was tailored based on variables related to behavior change, sometimes combined with cancer risk factors. Ten other articles described an intervention that tailored information based on risk factors only. Conclusion: Information that was tailored based on behavior change variables increased realistic perception of cancer risks and knowledge of cancer compared to generic information. Also, information tailored to individuals' risk factors increased realistic risk perception compared to generic information. Practice implications: To improve cancer risk perception and knowledge health providers could better give patients information about cancer risk and screening that is tailored to their personal characteristics than generic information. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 171
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oral contraceptives use and risk of cervical cancer-A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Asthana, Smita
    Busa, Vishal
    Labani, Satyanarayana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 247 : 163 - 175
  • [42] Does Women's Screening History Have Any Impact on Mammography Screening Attendance After Tailored Education? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Brevik, Thea B.
    Trope, Ameli
    Laake, Petter
    Bjorkly, Stal
    MEDICAL CARE, 2021, 59 (10) : 893 - 900
  • [43] Facilitating Factors and Barriers of Women's Cancer Screening in Iran: A Systematic Review
    Ghahramani, Sulmaz
    Kasraei, Hengameh
    Shahabi, Saeed
    Lankarani, Kamran Bagheri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [44] Barriers to utilisation of cervical cancer screening in Sub Sahara Africa: a systematic review
    Lim, J. N. W.
    Ojo, A. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2017, 26 (01)
  • [45] Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Asia: A systematic review
    Azeem, Eman
    Gillani, Syed Wasif
    Poh, Vinci
    Sulaiman, Syed Azhar Syed
    Baig, Mirza R.
    TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 15 (07) : 1543 - 1548
  • [46] Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
    Albuquerque, Andreia
    Rios, Elisabete
    Schmitt, Fernando
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (12)
  • [47] Depression Screening and Patient Outcomes in Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Meijer, Anna
    Roseman, Michelle
    Milette, Katherine
    Coyne, James C.
    Stefanek, Michael E.
    Ziegelstein, Roy C.
    Arthurs, Erin
    Leavens, Allison
    Palmer, Steven C.
    Stewart, Donna E.
    de Jonge, Peter
    Thombs, Brett D.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [48] Effectiveness of tailored communication intervention in increasing colonoscopy screening rates amongst first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bai, Yang
    Wong, Cho Lee
    He, Xiaole
    Wang, Changyi
    So, Winnie K. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 101
  • [49] Economic Evaluations of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening: A Systematic Review
    Mo, Xiuting
    Tobe, Ruoyan Gai
    Takahashi, Yoshimitsu
    Arata, Naoko
    Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan
    Nakayama, Takeo
    Mori, Rintaro
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 220 - 230
  • [50] Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening A Systematic Review
    Myers, Evan R.
    Moorman, Patricia
    Gierisch, Jennifer M.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Ghate, Sujata
    Davidson, Brittany
    Mongtomery, Ranee Chatterjee
    Crowley, Matthew J.
    McCrory, Douglas C.
    Kendrick, Amy
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (15): : 1615 - 1634