The diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen to detect colorectal cancer recurrence - A systematic review

被引:97
作者
Sorensen, Caspar G. [1 ]
Karlsson, William K. [1 ]
Pommergaard, Hans-Christian [2 ]
Burcharth, Jakob [3 ]
Rosenberg, Jacob [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Surg, Kettegard Alle 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Ctr Perioperat Optimizat, Dept Surg, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
Carcinoembryonic antigen; Biomarkers; Colorectal cancer; Curative surgery; Cancer recurrence; Follow-up; POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW-UP; CURATIVE RESECTION; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; STAGE-II; COLON-CANCER; CEA; DISEASE; SURVEILLANCE; SURGERY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.065
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) has been used as a tumor marker in the follow-up of colorectal cancer for more than 40 years. Controversy exists regarding its diagnostic applicability due to a relatively low sensitivity and a questionable effect on mortality. The aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CEA in detecting recurrence after intended curative surgery for primary colorectal cancer. Methods: Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, and articles were chosen based on predefined inclusion criteria. Reference lists from included articles were manually searched for additional publications of relevance. Results: Forty-two original studies with generally representative populations and long follow-up were included. Data were reported on outcomes from 9,834 CEA tests during follow-up. Reporting on the reference standards used was not optimal. Sensitivity of CEA ranged from 17.4 % to 100 %, specificity ranged from 66.1 % to 98.4 %, positive predictive value ranged from 45.8 % to 95.2% and negative predictive value ranged from 74.5 % to 100 %. Conclusion: Results point toward a sensitivity of CEA ranging between 50 % and 80 %, and a specificity and negative predictive value above 80 %. Results on positive predictive value showed low reliability. Overall, CEA did not effectively detect treatable recurrences at an early stage, and a clinically relevant effect on patient mortality remains to be proven. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 144
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SURG ONCOL CLIN N AM
  • [2] [Anonymous], SURG TODAY
  • [3] [Anonymous], J SURG ASS ROC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, GLOBOCAN 2012 V1 0 C
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [6] Banaszkiewicz Zbigniew, 2011, Pol Przegl Chir, V83, P310, DOI 10.2478/v10035-011-0048-y
  • [7] BEART RW, 1983, MAYO CLIN PROC, V58, P361
  • [8] CAMUNAS J, 1991, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V17, P530
  • [9] IS CEA ANALYSIS OF VALUE IN SCREENING FOR RECURRENCES AFTER SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA
    CARLSSON, U
    STEWENIUS, J
    EKELUND, G
    LEANDOER, L
    NOSSLIN, B
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1983, 26 (06) : 369 - 373
  • [10] CEA, CA 242, CA 19-9, CA 72-4 and hCGβ in the diagnosis of recurrent colorectal cancer
    Carpelan-Holmström, M
    Louhimo, J
    Stenman, UH
    Alfthan, H
    Järvinen, H
    Haglund, C
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (5-6) : 228 - 234