Modelling the dynamic response of gravity retaining wall systems using OpenSees

被引:0
|
作者
Kamalzadeh, A. [1 ]
Pender, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Recent work using the OpenSees finite element software to model the response of gravity retaining walls to Ricker wavelets is presented. The behaviour of the wall system during earthquake loading is controlled by the capacity of the shallow foundation supporting the wall. OpenSees is used to verify our contention that the primary mode of failure is one of rotational deformation rather than horizontal sliding. For situations where a gravity wall is founded on a rock layer or very hard soil, the horizontal acceleration at limiting equilibrium of the wall is controlled by sliding of the wall system on the foundation layer. For all other cases, a rotational failure mechanism based on mobilising the moment capacity of the foundation controls the limiting horizontal acceleration. Simple modelling shows that the horizontal acceleration to initiate rotational failure of the foundation is less than that to initiate sliding failure. Consequently, the design criteria for gravity walls is the residual displacement generated by rotation at foundation level during the course of the earthquake. Using the realistic cyclic stress-strain models available in OpenSees we have appropriate representations of the cyclic nonlinear behaviour of the cohesionless soil backfill and cohesionless soil beneath the foundation of the wall. The finite element modelling illuminates the understanding we have obtained from simple design analyses and enables us to evaluate the accumulation of permanent displacement during the course of the input excitation.
引用
收藏
页码:3161 / 3169
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dynamic Response of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Resting on Soft Clay
    Ripon Hore
    Sudipta Chakraborty
    Ayaz Mahmud Shuvon
    Md. Fayjul Bari
    Mehedi A. Ansary
    Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2021, 8 : 607 - 628
  • [22] Dynamic Response of Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Resting on Soft Clay
    Hore, Ripon
    Chakraborty, Sudipta
    Shuvon, Ayaz Mahmud
    Bari, Md. Fayjul
    Ansary, Mehedi A.
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 8 (04) : 607 - 628
  • [23] DYNAMIC-RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED-SOIL RETAINING WALL
    YOGENDRAKUMAR, M
    BATHURST, RJ
    FINN, WDL
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (08): : 1158 - 1167
  • [24] Investigation of retaining wall installation and performance using centrifuge modelling techniques
    Richards, DJ
    Powrie, W
    Page, JRT
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 131 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [25] Study on the influence of different soil parameters on the modal response of gravity retaining wall slope
    Chen, Li
    Zhang, Yachao
    Yang, Zhongyong
    Li, Qian
    Han, Linfeng
    AIP ADVANCES, 2021, 11 (12)
  • [26] Seismic fragility curves for concrete gravity retaining wall
    Li, Qionglin
    Li, Pangju
    Cui, Kai
    Ji, Yanzhi
    Zhang, Dongjie
    Qing, Yulan
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 183
  • [27] Centrifuge modelling of a soil nail retaining wall
    Jacobsz, S. W.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 55 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [28] LOAD TRANSFER AND STRESS IN A PILED GRAVITY RETAINING WALL
    Chen, Qun
    Wan, Li
    He, Changrong
    Lai, Zihui
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA SLOVENICA, 2010, 7 (02): : 30 - 44
  • [29] The Stability Reliability Analysis about Gravity Retaining Wall
    Yang Hongmei
    ADVANCED BUILDING MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2011, 250-253 (1-4): : 2352 - 2355
  • [30] A database for the performance of numerical modelling of retaining wall
    Riou, Y
    Mestat, P
    Kudella, P
    von Wolffersdorff, P
    GEOTECHNICAL MEASUREMENTS AND MODELLING, 2003, : 483 - 488