Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference (SMD), and Their Use in Meta-Analysis: As Simple as It Gets

被引:420
|
作者
Andrade, Chittaranjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Dept Clin Psychopharmacol & Neurotoxicol, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
D O I
10.4088/JCP.20f13681
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), endpoint scores, or change scores representing the difference between endpoint and baseline, are values of interest. These values are compared between experimental and control groups, yielding a mean difference between the experimental and control groups for each outcome that is compared. When the mean difference values for a specified outcome, obtained from different RCTs, are all in the same unit (such as when they were all obtained using the same rating instrument), they can be pooled in meta-analysis to yield a summary estimate that is also known as a mean difference (MD). Because pooling of the mean difference from individual RCTs is done after weighting the values for precision, this pooled MD is also known as the weighted mean difference (WMD). Sometimes, different studies use different rating instruments to measure the same outcome; that is, the units of measurement for the outcome of interest are different across studies. In such cases, the mean differences from the different RCTs cannot be pooled. However, these mean differences can be divided by their respective standard deviations (SDs) to yield a statistic known as the standardized mean difference (SMD). The SD that is used as the divisor is usually either the pooled SD or the SD of the control group; in the former instance, the SMD is known as Cohen's d, and in the latter instance, as Glass' delta. SMDs of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 are considered small, medium, and large, respectively. SMDs can be pooled in meta-analysis because the unit is uniform across studies. This article presents and explains the different terms and concepts with the help of simple examples.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of the Standardized Mean Difference for Repeated Measures Designs
    Smith, Lindsey J. Wolff
    Beretvas, S. Natasha
    JOURNAL OF MODERN APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS, 2009, 8 (02) : 600 - 609
  • [22] Methods for Estimating the Sampling Variance of the Standardized Mean Difference
    Suero, Manuel
    Botella, Juan
    Duran, Juan, I
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 28 (04) : 895 - 904
  • [23] Inferences on standardized mean difference: The generalized variable approach
    Tian, Lili
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (05) : 945 - 953
  • [24] Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose Antonio
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Van den Noortgate, Wim
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (03) : 489 - 503
  • [25] SIMPLE FORMULA TO CALCULATE MEAN TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE
    UNDERWOOD, AJ
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1970, 77 (13) : 192 - +
  • [26] Bayesian multivariate network meta-analysis model for the difference in restricted mean survival times
    Tang, Xiaoyu
    Trinquart, Ludovic
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (03) : 595 - 611
  • [27] The standardized mean difference within the framework of item response theory
    Wang, WC
    Chen, HC
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 64 (02) : 201 - 223
  • [28] ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOG MEAN AND MEAN LOG AVERAGING
    HERSHEY, RL
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1972, 51 (04): : 1194 - &
  • [29] Using Extant Data to Improve Estimation of the Standardized Mean Difference
    Fitzgerald, Kaitlyn G.
    Tipton, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2025, 50 (01) : 128 - 148
  • [30] A standardized mean difference effect size for single case designs
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Pustejovsky, James E.
    Shadish, William R.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (03) : 224 - 239