Evaluation of dose from kV cone-beam computed tomography during radiotherapy: a comparison of methodologies

被引:0
作者
Buckley, J. [1 ]
Wilkinson, D. [2 ]
Malaroda, A. [1 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Wollongong Hosp, Illawarra Canc Care Ctr, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
来源
MICRO-MINI & NANO-DOSIMETRY & INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN RADIATION THERAPY (MMND&ITRO2016) | 2017年 / 777卷
关键词
CT; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/777/1/012003
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Three alternative methodologies to the Computed-Tomography Dose Index for the evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography dose are compared, the Cone-Beam Dose Index, IAEA Human Health Report No. 5 recommended methodology and the AAPM Task Group 111 recommended methodology. The protocols were evaluated for Pelvis and Thorax scan modes on Varian (R) On-Board Imager and Truebeam kV XI imaging systems. The weighted planar average dose was highest for the AAPM methodology across all scans, with the CBDI being the second highest overall. A 17.96% and 1.14% decrease from the TG-111 protocol to the IAEA and CBDI protocols for the Pelvis mode and 18.15% and 13.10% decrease for the Thorax mode were observed for the XI system. For the OBI system, the variation was 16.46% and 7.14% for Pelvis mode and 15.93% to the CBDI protocol in Thorax mode respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF DOSE HOMOGENEITY IN CONE-BEAM BREAST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Mettivier, Giovanni
    Costa, Matilde
    Lanconelli, Nico
    Ianiro, Anna
    Pugliese, Mariagabriella
    Quarto, Maria
    Russo, Paolo
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 175 (04) : 473 - 481
  • [2] Measurement of skin dose from cone-beam computed tomography imaging
    Akyalcin, Sercan
    English, Jeryl D.
    Abramovitch, Kenneth M.
    Rong, Xiujiang J.
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2013, 9
  • [3] Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
    Chau, Anson C. M.
    Fung, Karl
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 107 (04): : 559 - 565
  • [4] Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging dose estimation and optimization: Need of daily cone-beam computed tomography
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    Dixit, Chandra K.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Bahl, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 470 - 474
  • [5] Investigation of the radiation dose from cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy: A comparison of methodologies
    Buckley, Jarryd G.
    Wilkinson, Dean
    Malaroda, Alessandra
    Metcalfe, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 174 - 183
  • [6] Evaluation of the pharyngeal recess with cone-beam computed tomography
    Erdem, Sule
    Zengin, Ayse Zeynep
    Erdem, Suheda
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2020, 42 (11) : 1307 - 1313
  • [7] Radiation dose measurements during kilovoltage-cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiotherapy
    Kumar, A. Sathish
    Singh, I. Rabi Raja
    Sharma, Sunil Dutt
    John, Subhashini
    Ravindran, B. Paul
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 858 - 863
  • [8] Automated dose evaluation on daily cone-beam computed tomography for breast cancer patients
    Koerkamp, Maureen Groot
    Stijnman, Peter
    Houweling, Antonetta
    Zachiu, Cornel
    Kotte, Alexis
    Raaymakers, Bas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 200
  • [9] Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics
    Signorelli, Luca
    Patcas, Raphael
    Peltomaki, Timo
    Schaetzle, Marc
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2016, 77 (01): : 9 - 15
  • [10] Organ dose and radiogenic risk in dental cone-beam computed tomography examinations
    Almuqrin, Aljawhara H.
    Tamam, Nissren
    Abdelrazig, A.
    Elnour, A.
    Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 176