An Improved Morphological Algorithm for Defect Detection on Point Cloud Data

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Hongyu [1 ]
Zhang, Ruixun [2 ]
Li, Huichao [1 ]
Shao, Xiuli [1 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] MIT, Lab Financial Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICAIIS) | 2020年
关键词
Point cloud data; Morphological algorithm; Opening operation; Closing operation; Window increment strategy;
D O I
10.1109/icaiis49377.2020.9194935
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There are often various defect points in the original point cloud data. Therefore, the point cloud data need to be pre-processed by filtering algorithms. The classical morphological algorithm is a common method to filter point cloud data. However, classical morphological algorithms often have limitations when applied to large-scale filtering. On the one hand, the classical algorithm adopts single opening or single closing operation to filter the point cloud data, which results in its inability to detect concave and convex defect points simultaneously. On the other hand, the filtering window linear increment strategy is used in the classical algorithm, which may influence filtering accuracy when applied to large workpieces. Because of these issues, this paper proposes two methods to improve the classical morphology algorithm and applies it to filter point cloud data on the rotor surface. One method is to change single opening or single closing operation to alternating opening and closing operations to realize simultaneous detection of concave and convex defects, while the other is to design a more flexible filter window increment strategy based on rotor surface curvature. Finally, compared with the classical algorithm, we show that the filtering accuracy can be increased by more than 11% through the improved algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 17
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Building region derivation from LiDAR data using a reversed iterative mathematic morphological algorithm
    Cheng, Liang
    Zhao, Wei
    Han, Peng
    Zhang, Wen
    Shan, Jie
    Liu, Yongxue
    Li, Manchun
    [J]. OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 286 : 244 - 250
  • [2] Heijmans H., 1994, Morphological Image Operators, Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics: Supplement
  • [3] An Improved Morphological Algorithm for Filtering Airborne LiDAR Point Cloud Based on Multi-Level Kriging Interpolation
    Hui, Zhenyang
    Hu, Youjian
    Yevenyo, Yao Ziggah
    Yu, Xianyu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (01)
  • [4] HUI ZY, 2019, APPL OPTICS, V56
  • [5] Jiang L, 2018, CHIN ACAD LIBRARY, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-56352-6_1
  • [6] A gradient-constrained morphological filtering algorithm for airborne LiDAR
    Li, Yong
    Wu, Huayi
    Xu, Hanwei
    An, Ru
    Xu, Jia
    He, Qisheng
    [J]. OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 54 : 288 - 296
  • [7] Deep learning
    Rusk, Nicole
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2016, 13 (01) : 35 - 35
  • [8] Science-Fire Science, SCI LETT
  • [9] Steger C., 1996, Computer Vision - ECCV '96. 4th Eurpean Conference on Computer Proceedings, P630, DOI 10.1007/BFb0015573
  • [10] An unbiased detector of curvilinear structures
    Steger, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1998, 20 (02) : 113 - 125