Business model disclosure in the Strategic Report Entangling intellectual capital in value creation process

被引:38
作者
Bini, Laura [1 ]
Dainelli, Francesco [1 ]
Giunta, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Econ & Business Studies, Florence, Italy
关键词
Business model; Disclosure quality; Intellectual capital; Companies Act; Strategic Report;
D O I
10.1108/JIC-09-2015-0076
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate business model (BM) disclosure. As the BM shows how a company creates and captures value, its communication in the Annual Report is considered a necessary background for a dynamic analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of the intellectual capital (IC) contribution to a company's competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach - Focusing on a sample of listed UK companies operating in high-technology industries, this paper runs a content analysis of BM disclosure presented in the Strategic Report (SR). To develop the analysis, it refers to an ontological approach that encompasses the main research contributions to this topic. Findings - The analysis of SRs revealed that few companies use their BM disclosure to highlight the contribution of their IC to create and capture value. BM descriptions are not always clearly distinguishable from other strategic concepts and poorly illustrate the interactions among the BM components, which help understand how IC is entangled in a company's value creation process. Practical implications - This paper answers the Financial Reporting Council's call for comments about its Guidance on SR. More in general, it contributes to the issue of the regulation of narrative information in the Annual Report. Originality/value - This paper proposes a methodological framework for the analysis of BM disclosure quality. Thanks to this framework, it points out some critical issues of BM disclosure and offers some hints useful for its regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 102
页数:20
相关论文
共 86 条
[61]  
Mouritsen J., 2005, Management Accounting Research, V16, P371, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.MAR.2005.06.006
[62]  
Nielsen C., 2010, 2 AALB U DEP BUS STU
[63]  
Nielsen C., 2013, COMMUNICATING STRATE
[64]  
Nielsen C., 2009, CRIT PERSPECT, V20, P847, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2008.09.007, 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.007]
[65]  
Nielsen C., 2008, 62008 AALB U DEP BUS
[66]  
Nielsen C., 2008, 7 AALB U DEP BUS STU
[67]  
Nielsen C., 2012, WORKING PAPER
[68]   Becoming critical on intellectual capital [J].
O'Donnell, David ;
Henriksen, Lars Bo ;
Voelpel, Sven C. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2006, 7 (01) :5-+
[69]  
Osterwalder A, 2005, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V16
[70]  
Perkmann M, 2010, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V29, P265, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000029020